Jump to content

Jon Morosi: Orioles agree with Kevin Gregg


AJismyhero

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 246
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Stupid contract. Rauch would have been the better target and probably cost less...At least they didn't sign Balfour..that's the only good thing I can say about this.

Do you think this a desperation knee jerk reaction from the front office from the Simon news? Or do you think its the O's being the O's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think this a desperation knee jerk reaction from the front office from the Simon news? Or do you think its the O's being the O's?

This is the O's being the O's. They made some sort of offer BEFORE the Simon incident. Going up an extra million or two wasn't going to deter them from getting him, apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think this a desperation knee jerk reaction from the front office from the Simon news? Or do you think its the O's being the O's?

They have been after Gregg this whole offseason, as well as last year....Has nothing to do with Simon.

Its just a poor contract given out to an ok reliever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sure hope you heard wrong!!

Why? What is the difference in impact on this team's payroll of an extra $1 (since he was rumored at 2/$10 anyway) million? None. Impact on ability to sign another player? None. Impact on ability to sign draft picks? None. None of our other acquisitions, while all pretty solid, had big dollar impacts on the budget. Plenty of money for any draft picks, including overslots. Plenty for international free agents if we ever plan to sign any. Heck, there's still enough to sign Beltre if they wanted to, but they won't.

Everyone admits that this team has to overpay to attract free agents, then complains when they do, even if it's only $1-2 (extra) over 2 years. The extra money really is a non-issue and barely a reason to nitpick the move. And, they could still sign other relief options to MiL contracts with invitations to camp, as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like this signing. And those saying "I like it as long as he doesn't close", just trust Buck. This is a signing to get a solid bullpen arm in the bullpen. Buck used the bullpen at the end of last season about as perfect as you can use a bullpen. He will use Gregg in a situation that helps the team, whichever that is. If it's as a closer then Buck thinks that he is the best 9th inning guy on the team. If Buck thins otherwise then he won't close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be completely OK with this deal if it was a 2/6 or even a 2/7 type deal. A 2/11 deal is just WAY too much money. All that being said, I would have rather had Rauch on a 2/6 or 2/7 deal, although I don't know if he'd be interested in coming here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? What is the difference in impact on this team's payroll of an extra $1 (since he was rumored at 2/$10 anyway) million? None. Impact on ability to sign another player? None. Impact on ability to sign draft picks? None. None of our other acquisitions, while all pretty solid, had big dollar impacts on the budget. Plenty of money for any draft picks, including overslots. Plenty for international free agents if we ever plan to sign any. Heck, there's still enough to sign Beltre if they wanted to, but they won't.

Everyone admits that this team has to overpay to attract free agents, then complains when they do, even if it's only $1-2 (extra) over 2 years. The extra money really is a non-issue and barely a reason to nitpick the move. And, they could still sign other relief options to MiL contracts with invitations to camp, as well.

I just think that paying that much for an average reliever is a bit much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...