Jump to content

Jon Morosi: Orioles agree with Kevin Gregg


AJismyhero

Recommended Posts

I just think that paying that much for an average reliever is a bit much.

Right. Your mid-case projection here has to be paying $10M for 1, 1.5 wins, or $5-8M in value.

If they go 5 million per for this guy, I'm going to scream. Brandon Webb just signed for 3 million. This would be a horrendous waste of money, IMO. Could be wrong. I've just seen us urinate away so much cash through the years on exactly this type of pitcher - a good but not great reliever. No thankee.

Not sure what Webb has to do with this. Webb is a starter with an arm held on by duct tape and bailing wire. A Chevy Volt could be had for $40k, and is probably as relevant to the 2011 Orioles pen.

Basically traded a few extra million signing Gregg to keep the 2nd round pick. Guess we'll see ... in a few years ... if it was a smart move.

Yes, of course it's a smart move, because draft picks are a probabilistic exercise. The more you have the better chance of one really paying off. Giving up a chance for anything less than a big-time player is usually stupid.

With all due respect, why do so many people on here sweat a $4 mill swing over two years so much?? I don't see how that prevents them from doing anything and everything else they need to do during that time period. We don't have an expensive roster. It's the personal equivalent of buying something you need for $20 at Target and seeing it 10 days later at Walmart for $17.99. No biggie, you slightly overpaid.

Probably because of the many times we've seen the O's gnash teeth and wring hands and cry poor over similar amounts of money for players with vastly higher upside. What did Sano sign for again? What did Chapman sign for? If $4M is a rounding error no one should care about, then why can't the O's lump together a handful of rounding errors and sign a 20-year-old kid from Cuba that throws 102? If $4M doesn't matter, why do the O's always go right to the deadline on draft picks trying to save a few hundred $K? Or why do they risk losing all compensation by playing arb games with a guy like Koji over $2M?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 246
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Money spend on Gregg is money that can't be spent somewhere else. Simple as that.

Well, that's true of any dollar spent on anything. It's only important if we've hit the limit of what was available to spend on the assets available to be bought. Is there any player out there that you want that the Orioles won't have the money to get because of the Gregg contract? Just don't see it as an issue, in this case. It's not like they just gave Jason Werth a contract worthy of Albert Pujols or A-Rod $25mil when the next best offer was around $17mil. Those were bad, not this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If $4M is a rounding error no one should care about, then why can't the O's lump together a handful of rounding errors and sign a 20-year-old kid from Cuba that throws 102? If $4M doesn't matter, why do the O's always go right to the deadline on draft picks trying to save a few hundred $K? Or why do they risk losing all compensation by playing arb games with a guy like Koji over $2M?

So we can fill out our bullpen, apparently. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles do not get to spend Peter Angelos' personal fortune. Or Masn profits. They are a self contained business entity. Peter spent money to buy the Orioles at a bankruptcy auction. Maybe he and some of his minority investors spent a few million on the team back in the day. For the most part, MLB baseball teams are profitable investments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Hayden2004

danconnollysun Dan Connolly

#Orioles contract with RHP Kevin Gregg is 2 years, $10 million. But there is a vesting option for a third year as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably because of the many times we've seen the O's gnash teeth and wring hands and cry poor over similar amounts of money for players with vastly higher upside. What did Sano sign for again? What did Chapman sign for? If $4M is a rounding error no one should care about, then why can't the O's lump together a handful of rounding errors and sign a 20-year-old kid from Cuba that throws 102? If $4M doesn't matter, why do the O's always go right to the deadline on draft picks trying to save a few hundred $K? Or why do they risk losing all compensation by playing arb games with a guy like Koji over $2M?

Exactly...This also continues to prove that the Orioles still struggle with the concept that these mid range contracts rarely work out in your favor...That you can get similar or better production for far less.

Milwaukee getting Saito for 1/2 makes this contract look much much worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, of course it's a smart move, because draft picks are a probabilistic exercise. The more you have the better chance of one really paying off. Giving up a chance for anything less than a big-time player is usually stupid.

Probably because of the many times we've seen the O's gnash teeth and wring hands and cry poor over similar amounts of money for players with vastly higher upside. What did Sano sign for again? What did Chapman sign for? If $4M is a rounding error no one should care about, then why can't the O's lump together a handful of rounding errors and sign a 20-year-old kid from Cuba that throws 102? If $4M doesn't matter, why do the O's always go right to the deadline on draft picks trying to save a few hundred $K? Or why do they risk losing all compensation by playing arb games with a guy like Koji over $2M?

This. If $4M isn't a huge deal BAL should be spending an additional $4M each year between the draft and int'l signings, regardless of if they are safe or low probability. I'd rather gamble $4M there with zero info on the player than throw it away for no reason on ML role players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a guy whose net worth was estimated at 1.2 BILLION last year is not going to be able to spend money elsewhere if we spent an extra 2 or 3 million on a reliever? I don't get it.

Because in the real world Major League Baseball teams almost always pay for payroll out of team revenues, not out of owner bank accounts.

Sometimes I think fans really do envision Angelos as sitting on a big pile of cash and gold like Scrooge McDuck, and peeling off $1M bills when Andy asks him for a new reliever.

"They" are saying maybe 2/10 or so for Gregg. That is probably a few million over market value. But we got a solid BP arm, and save a draft pick. And it will take a few years before we would know if that draft pick is potentially any good.

We know right now that it's a good thing to have more chips in the draft. Saying it'll take a few years to know if the draft pick will be any good is like asking if you'd rather have 5 raffle tickets or four. Of course you're better off with five.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably because of the many times we've seen the O's gnash teeth and wring hands and cry poor over similar amounts of money for players with vastly higher upside. What did Sano sign for again? What did Chapman sign for? If $4M is a rounding error no one should care about, then why can't the O's lump together a handful of rounding errors and sign a 20-year-old kid from Cuba that throws 102? If $4M doesn't matter, why do the O's always go right to the deadline on draft picks trying to save a few hundred $K? Or why do they risk losing all compensation by playing arb games with a guy like Koji over $2M?

Chapman's the only one in this group that really hurts. AM was right on Koji and just about everyone else that he's ever non-tendered. Our draft picks get signed, even tough ones like Wieters, and to very large contracts for Machado and a number of overslots over the past several years. I haven't lost any sleep over Sano. But, Chapman hurts. Having him in the bullpen would be incredible. The rotation, even better if he could hold up physically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand people thinking we paid too much for Gregg and maybe Rauch etc. "possibly" could have been had for less but...

1. You don't know what other relievers/agents are saying about coming here.

2. A two year deal does not cripple this team.

3. You don't know Showalter's influence on getting players that HE thinks "fit" this team.

4. We are going to have to over pay for players because of the last decade + of losing.

5. Relievers can help this team without crippling our budget by overpaying.

This team needs to get respectable before quality free-agents are going to come here. I honestly think this team is capable of getting to that level this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I haven't watched any.  International competitions really never have greatly interested me,  be it the Olympics, World Cup or whatever.  I also don't have a current TV service so watching them would be more difficult than I care to go through right now.   I should have MLB.tv in week or so,  then I'll get all the baseball I want!  
    • With just over a week until Opening Day, who makes the final MLB roster?  Safe = 18: SP: Gibson, Ivin, Bradish, Kremer RP: Bautista, Baker, Perez, Akin IF: Mateo, Mountcastle, Urias, Henderson, Frazier, Rutschmann, McCann OF: Santander, Mullins, Hays Prediction: SP: Rodriguez RP: Wells, Voth (especially with Givens injured, I think these two are definitely on the roster), Bauman, Politi IF: Vavra OF: McKenna, Stowers
    • Unfortunately have not really been able to watch I wish they showed more ST games on MASN.
    • Prospects Live has their first scouting book out and Gunnar is on the cover.  Please be no jinx. Please be no jinx. Prospects Live
    • I have no doubt that the WBC games are 100 times more electric than a spring training game.  ST games are very relaxing and fun, but they are the opposite of intense.  I’m still surprised at the viewing disparity, though I’ll wait until tomorrow night before considering the poll results comparable since I started the WBC poll a day earlier.  
    • Fangraphs credits him with 2.1 fWAR at 3B and 1.7 at SS, so that’s 3.8 so far (it’s possible they might have him dabbling at DH once in a while, we’ll see).  At SS, the O’s ranked 18th at 3.4 fWAR, with Mateo and Henderson splitting time roughly 60/40.  Fangraphs comments: “This playing time projection is the numerical equivalent of throwing your hands up in the air. Henderson looks bound for stardom, be it at third or shortstop, but Mateo is still holding on to the position for now after a solid defensive year established him as the everyday starter. His offensive numbers are downright ugly – that .284 projected wOBA is the second-lowest for anyone in this article with 100 or more PAs – but you can get away with that kind of bat at shortstop if your glove is transcendent. “In 2022, Mateo’s was, but he’d never flashed that level of defense before, so Orioles talent evaluators will have their work cut out for them early in the year. Henderson will likely start the season at third base, but if Mateo’s defense looks shaky, the team should make the switch sooner rather than later. Those offensive numbers next to Henderson’s name are no joke — think Corey Seager, if you’re looking for a parallel as an offense-first lefty shortstop. 2023 is just the start of Baltimore’s plan for contention, but what they do at shortstop will have ramifications for both this year and the future.” https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2023-positional-power-rankings-shortstop/  
    • What I've been seeing overall is that a lot of fans were more engaged with the WBC than with their regular team this spring. Just yesterday I was talking to someone who had gone to the games in Miami and were raving about the experience.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...