I don't think C_o_C was being intentionally misleading either. I just don't agree with the suggestion that this distinction was perfectly clear from the title, that's all. And agree on the bolded, however, what I would suggest as the most likely scenario is that the leaseholders (the teams) wanted to see something like this in place before agreeing to a new long-term lease, in order to de-risk a situation where they look to fund improvements let's say 5-10 years down the line and get told n