I mentioned Diaz and Mountcastle, both of which you agreed with me on, how is that basing my opinion on two completely fringe roster types?
Would you say that the O's were aggressive promoting anyone last year?
Some experts thought that Hall's issues with command was exacerbated by his opposition being overwhelmed and refusing to swing. Doesn't that sound like someone that could have benefited from a promotion late in the year?
I think Mr Sampson's take was worthy of criticism.
I won't reciprocate in making a critique of your posting habits since that isn't fun for others.