Yardball85
-
Posts
3734 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Yardball85
-
-
5 minutes ago, Gurgi said:
Can you imagine Severino catching a knuckball pitcher? He will allow a passed ball EACH inning. Watch.
LOL. You're not wrong there...
-
6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:
Steven Wright.
Thanks. Good call.
-
1 minute ago, LocoChris said:
Good move.
Indeed. IF nothing more, it adds some fun to the next few weeks.
Who was the last one in MLB? Dickey?
-
-
13 minutes ago, wildcard said:
I don't think trading Trey for a DH is a good trade.
I'd hope the O's would more than just Hiura in SG's proposa. But agreed, Mancini for Hiura would be poor.
-
13 hours ago, pdiddy said:
Mullins is particularly difficult to assess IMO because of the abandonment of switch hitting. I was concerned in May that the scouting had adjusted but then he just started raking again. In any case it’s a small bright spot in an awful season (like watching Cal hit beach balls in 1991). Unless a contending team has a high profile injury I don’t think anyone is risking looking dumb by trading for him for what the Os should ask for though and I’m ok with that.
Question for the more knowledgeable folks regarding Manny - is he worth what we thought he was worth when he was traded? I thought he was going to continue getting better but…
Good post and I agree.
- 1
-
15 hours ago, Sports Guy said:
I love it when people say Mullins IS worth a ton. We have no idea what his worth is. His worth is what someone will pay
Exactly. As in anything in this world, value is determined by what the market is/what someone will pay. Perhaps other teams see Mullins as a mirage and won't give us a solid return for him. In which case, you keep him and hope he keeps this up.
-
11 minutes ago, Philip said:
Trading Mullins for what we got for Machado would be awful.
Now that we see how the Machado return panned out, sure.
But as SG said, Diaz was a top 50 guy, and you are trying to capitalize on two great months from Mullins.
-
30 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:
Diaz was a top 50 guy when we got him. If you get a top 50 guy (and presumably you and your scouts love him), a potential mid to back end starter, a potential solid BP arm, I think you think long and hard about that deal.
I’m not saying he’s a complete slam dunk but if the second player was a rising guy like Bradish and you get a highly ranked guy, that’s a lot to say no to for a guy who has had 2 great months in the majors and is already 26.
Thank you.
Obviously if Mullins is still doing this a year from now and put a .900+ OPS in 2021, then this changes things.
-
7 minutes ago, LocoChris said:
Don’t agree, the return would have to be even better than what they got for Machado, who was a rental.
I see your point, and a Machado return as it existed in 2018 is probably the lowest I'd go. But we are talking about 2.5 months of success. If this is the 2021/22 offseason, and he has sustauined these numbers , I am demanding a lot more.
-
2 minutes ago, wildcard said:
Reality check: You said you would trade Mullins for something close to what the O's got in the Manny trade. I said I would not. You said you would take what the O's hope they got at the time of the trade.
That sounds like you valuing hope of what the O's got over the reality of what the O's got.
Its as simple as that.
In other words, the Machado return had more value then than it does now, because Diaz hasn't really panned out. He was more valuable then. So, I would take a package that had the same value as the trade had in 2018. I would not take a package that includes 2021 Diaz and 2021 Kremer as headliners. My point is extremely clear.
-
39 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:
With the service time Cedric has left, I would not be happy with a 2018 like trade package for Manny. I wasn't thrilled with the Manny trade at the time, but that's more on the Orioles for not trading Manny sooner after failing to secure a contract extension.
But the big difference is, Machado was an established star, whereas Mullins is two years removed from being optioned to Bowie because he couldn't hit. Obviously Mullins has value because he is cheap and controllable, and hopefully the swtich to hitting left handed has yielded sustainable results, but Diaz (who was very highly ranked at the time), plus Kremer, Pop, and Bannon, is a deal you take for Mullins now.
-
41 minutes ago, wildcard said:
So you would trade for hope over reality.
Isn't that what most trades for prospects are? Isn't that why we traded Bundy for Bradish, Brnovich, et al? I don't understand your post at all...
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, wildcard said:
I would not trade Mullins for Kremer, Diaz, Pop and Bannon.
Not the present version of them. But I absolutely would for the 2018 versions of them.
- 2
-
You absolutely trade Mullins in the right deal. But the right deal should be close to what the Orioles got for Machado considering all of the control Mullins has.
-
-
1 hour ago, accinfo said:
Bet the over. In all seriousness this is one of those games it is hard to watch during the rebuild. You know Eshelman is a live body to get through 1 of 162 and that is all. They will probably win with all that said.
- 1
-
13 hours ago, Sports Guy said:
This is an embarrassment.
Multiple tweets.
Absolutely pathetic of the Orioles. They should be embarrassed and dragged for this.
-
Definitely time. Wilkerson has been awful defensively, and does not provide anything with the bat.
-
Nineteen year-old lottery ticket for a valueless journeyman? Sure, why not?
-
5 minutes ago, eddie83 said:
Glad you took the positive side!!!
It's Friday!
-
3 minutes ago, eddie83 said:
1.401 OPS in 35 ABs in AAA this year for Leyba :). Not terrible minor league numbers.
-
1 hour ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:
They sent Lowther back down, which already opens a spot on the 26 man roster.
With Scoreler struggling last night at Norfolk, I wonder if they play the “he had a set back” game and transfer him to the 60 day IL.
Wells has been solid. One good Rule 5 selection should be sufficient.
-
3 hours ago, Sports Guy said:
Why would you keep Waddell or Lakins Sr or any number of guys? They literally could DFA almost half of the 40 Man roster and it wouldn’t matter one bit.
This is true. The 40 man largely consists of guys on the Orioles and Norfolk, who have been absolutely awful.
Knuckler Jannis Up, Sceroler DFA
in Orioles Talk
Posted
Yup. Should have protected Pop over him 100%.