Jump to content

ChosenOne21

Plus Member
  • Posts

    1431
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ChosenOne21

  1. 1 hour ago, SteveA said:

    In the bottom of the first inning, the 2023 #1 overall pick in the MLB draft will take the mound, throwing to his catcher who is the 2021 #1 overall pick.  The first two batters they face will be the 2022 #1 overall pick and the 2019 #1 overall pick.

    Trivia question:  Can you name the 7 #1 overall picks who have played for the Orioles?  And then the 2 who have only appeared for the Orioles in spring training games but never in the regular season?   And then the 1 whose was almost traded to the Orioles once and whose son has in fact played for the Orioles.

    Ben McDonald
    Adley Rutschman
    Tim Beckham
    Kris Benson?

    EDIT: Jackson Holliday is one of the spring training ones. Don't know who the other is.

    Double EDIT: I looked up the other three. One I should have known, one I didn't know was a #1 draft pick. Also had no idea the guy whose son has played for us was ever almost traded to us.

  2. 1 hour ago, Frobby said:

    If Wong makes the team and Holliday is sent to AAA, this board is going to explode.  But I’d be fine with it if Holliday looks like he needs some refining at AAA.  

    If Wong makes the team for any reason other than injury, I'm going to explode. We have too many young, good infielders who need playing time, handedness be damned.

    • Upvote 2
  3. 4 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

    How? What's the worst that can happen? 

    In my opinion, Teheran has zero left in the tank. If it was just a standard minor league signing, who cares. But we gave him a 100K signing bonus and his MLB salary is $2M.

    It's not a disaster or anything, but there has to be someone out there for less money with more in the tank.

    • Upvote 1
  4. I think McKenna is likely gone based on all the minor-league signings of players with similar profiles.

    I think Baumann gets every chance to make the club given the state of our bullpen. If he struggles though, I doubt Elias is slow to DFA him.

  5. 6 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

    Cedric is potent - I actually don't guess them to be very similar Bats even though the CF transition is clear.    I don't have a lot of taste for Cedric back at leadoff as I think a few teammates are much better bets to get 5 PA night in night out, but would love him closer to the middle.    It'd be against tradition for him to go ahead of the O'Hearn/Mountcastle types.

    His name hasn't come up yet, but one of my favorite league walk leaders was Chone Figgins.    He scored 114 runs that year as part of an almost 900-run offense.

    I totally forgot Chone Figgins was a player. I think he's a pretty good comp for a successful Bradfield, though I think Bradfield is a better defender at a more premium position and will have a higher SB success rate.

  6. 1 hour ago, Orioles West said:

    I guess I'm not one of the fans who elevated Brady to super villain status. I understand folks have issues with Anderson, I get it. In a limited cheerleader role, I would be okay with it.

    Anderson's crime was not leaving a cushy job where he got to do what he loved. Dunning-Kreuger suggests he might not have even been aware he was bad at it.

  7. 2 hours ago, Frobby said:

    Why?  He was a real coach for several years.  This seems like a fun gig.  

    I actually was not aware of that. Never mind!

    He just always struck me as a guy who was kind of done with baseball and done with the city of Baltimore, but maybe not.

  8. 2 hours ago, emmett16 said:

    They really like that move.  I think I heard talk of MLB not allowing that in the future.  

    I'm guessing they don't like that it removes the contract from being used in future arbitration decisions? The simple fix would be to allow club options, but once the players and clubs have exchanged figures, any contract with only one year guaranteed counts for future decisions.

    The players probably won't like that, or any rule, that limits their negotiating options.

  9. 34 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

    According to Fangraphs he has over 5 years of service time heading into this year so he would have been a FA after this season.  If so, signing a club option for 2025 with no guaranteed money makes no sense at all.  To pick up an extra 300K and avoiding arbitration where he might have picked up an extra 600K?   I must be missing something.

    I wonder if he and his agent thought the Orioles would move one of Cowser, Kjerstad, Santander, Mountcastle, Stowers, or anyone else who would compete with him for playing time, increasing his leverage. When they didn't, maybe it was time to retreat to safety?

  10. 9 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

    Why would O’Hearn and his agent sign this?   He isn’t guaranteed anything for 2025 but the Orioles can keep him if they want.   No big deal to me but what is O’Hearns incentive for agreeing to a club option?

    Probably because his career is hanging by a thread and he didn't want to risk 300K by going to arbitration. He's basically a platoon first baseman who's about to be on the wrong side of 30 who has had one good year in the last five or so. There's a good chance this season is his last, and he doesn't want to risk leaving any money on the table.

    At least that's my guess.

    • Upvote 2
  11. 22 minutes ago, dystopia said:

    How nice is it to even be on a graphic like this? Hardly feels real. 
     

    I think the Mariners have the best rotation listed here. O’s 2nd, Jays and Astros are a wash, and the Skanks are a distant 5th. Kind of a joke they’re even on this list honestly. 

    The Yankees rotation has a lot of health question marks, but a sky-high ceiling. Without looking at every team's rotation I can't say if they belong here or not, but there is a lot of upside.

  12. 21 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

    LOL. The guy makes one trade and now he's "all in" and mortgaging the future for a World Series? He traded two aging prospects who realistically projected to be a solid utility type player and a back end reliever. We're not the Tampa Bay Rays. We never were. The only reason John Angelos tied Elias' hands financially was to make the team more appealing to a perspective buyer. We may not quite be on the same level as the Dodgers, but with the new ownership set to take over I think we're going to be a lot closer to that business model than the Rays. As someone else mentioned the Dodgers do a great job of developing young talent and taking advantage of the FA market. I expect us to do the same, even if it's on smaller financial scale. 

    Elias has so much prospect capital that trading his spare parts would be many other teams' "all-in" Losing Ortiz barely moves the needle on our ability to compete in the future and, honestly, he's so good at finding relievers on the scrap heap I'm not sure losing Hall moves the needle much either.

  13. 25 minutes ago, wildcard said:

    To me the trade for Corbin Burnes represents a mentality shift for Elias.   Since 2018 when he was hired he has been all about collecting high ceiling talent.  And he guarded that talent consistently.  Not trading it.  Taking every opportunity to add to the young talent.

    But with the Burnes trade it feels to me like Elias has shifted to "How do I win a World Series".   He just traded  12 years of young talent control for one year of a veteran ace.   That is counter to what he has done up to this point.

    I have no doubt that Elias worked on the Burnes trade for three months just like he says. But I am sure there have been other trades he as worked on that he didn't pull the trigger on because he was guarding the young talent.   The Cease trade is a example.   Just couldn't give up that talent.   And I am sure there have been others in the recent years. 

    It was a big decision to trade DL Hall.  1st rounder with great stuff and a big future.   Some may think of him as a reliever but in my mind that is because he is a late developer because of injuries.   Given the chance, coaching, and health he still has a huge up side of being a starter with wipe out stuff.  6 years of that talent just walked out the door.  Talent that Elias has guarded up until now. 

    Same with Ortiz but he was kinda blocked.   But he should have been in ST and made the O's opening day roster.  Best SS in the organization.  He is probably more ready than Holliday at this point.   6 more years of control of a talented player walked.

    This a real mental shift for Elias.  Its really go for it for one big World Series year.  Focus on one year instead of the focus on the next six years.  Sure the O's have other talent that allows this shift.  But make no mistake this is the first real example of trading young talent for short term improvement.

    I agree that this is the first offseason Elias has had a good reason to deal from his high-end talent surpluses.

    I think the main reason we don't have Cease isn't because Elias is "hoarding talent" but because the White Sox's demands were ridiculous.

    People are dreaming if they think D.L. Hall has more than like a 5% chance to be a good MLB starter. The command isn't there and he'll struggle to get you five innings most days. Sure, maybe the O's couldn't unlock him and the Brewers can, but Hall has been around for, what, six years now? He also hasn't been durable and I think his max IP for a season is 89. He's a reliever, and quite likely a darn good one and that's fine.

×
×
  • Create New...