Jump to content

Can_of_corn

Plus Member
  • Posts

    113933
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    415

Everything posted by Can_of_corn

  1. I mean getting a fair return on the investment. Spend 1.7M get 1.7M worth of return. Although honestly the return should be higher since the O's have the risk of not being able to trade him and being on the hook for his whole salary. Just seems like a poorly thought out plan, I'd rather take on a bad contract now than hope to flip a player later in the season.
  2. I think it is likely that you won't get a good return on your money if you do trade him. How good a prospect do you need to get to break even on what you pay Puig?
  3. I wasn't suggesting that you were suggesting a Torres level return. ? I was just naming the most recent clear overpay I could recall.
  4. Other than Torres I don't recall much recent history of teams overpay for a playoff run.
  5. It does sound like the type of move they would have made fifteen years ago under Peter.
  6. No way they send bigfoot to the moon, he weighs way too much.
  7. https://www.bleedcubbieblue.com/2020/6/12/21289444/mlb-tv-blackouts-2020-season
  8. How much did it help Means? I think Mountcastle could have benefited from facing major league pitching, perhaps it would have helped him realize that just because you can make contact with a pitch it doesn't mean you should swing at it. He also could have used more reps in the field. Going into the offseason with that kind of experience to build off of couldn't have hurt. As for the extra control? Will he: Still be a major league player? Still an Oriole? Worth paying Arb 4? Not playing under an extension? All of the above assume no changes in the CBA. I think the odds are pretty remote the O's see any benefit down the line.
  9. Yea, for a top prospect. I'm making the argument that the team would have benefited more from having Mountcastle up last September than will occur from him perhaps becoming a Arb 4 player.
  10. The thing that concerns me about the pick is how much weight they seemingly gave to their projections based off of a limited 2020 data set.
  11. I guess if the overall K rate keep climbing sooner or later it will have to happen.
  12. Sorry I can't separate the decision. Elias deciding that a fringe top 100 guy needed to have his service time manipulated happened last year and I think the O's missed out on a good chance to further develop the player on both sides of the ball. I don't think he's willing to publicly reverse himself now, he's committed to this course of action.
  13. He also could have been up last September, developmental time that, given what has happened since, would have been useful.
  14. Can't say I remember Aderlin. I did see that Ubaldo was released. He's not retiring. https://mlb.nbcsports.com/2020/07/09/ubaldo-jimenez-im-not-thinking-about-retirement-yet/
  15. I'm a fan but I admit it is a point of concern. I think he has a fair chance to be a bust.
  16. The same Hays who is only a rookie because they gamed his eligibility.
×
×
  • Create New...