Jump to content

Henry Urrutia (DFA)


weams

Recommended Posts

I think the key part of what Buck said is the part you didn't bold. If you include it as one statement, it seems that Buck is saying that Urrutia is maintaining the same work ethic. If you cut out the first part of the statement, it sounds negative. The full context is immensely important.

Yep. It sounds to me like he's saying he put in some really good work up here. It's a shame he had to be sent down. The "challenge" part is more of a don't get discouraged rather than an attempted kick in the ass bases on my reading.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Henry hit a 3-run homer in the AAA game today. Nice to see him flashing some power.

They said he looks stronger and has bulked up, which is a good thing for his power.

Not being the fastest guy on the field, I wonder how this will impact his ability to cover ground in the OF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, with de aza and possibly Pearce gone after this season, Urrutia and Alvarez could both be in consideration for bigger roles in 2016, even with limited at bats at the ML level in 2015.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Maybe, but he's 28 now, and if he gets limited ABs this year he'll be 29 with very limited MLB exposure going into 2016. An average player is as good at Urrutia's age (right now) as they'll ever be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, but he's 28 now, and if he gets limited ABs this year he'll be 29 with very limited MLB exposure going into 2016. An average player is as good at Urrutia's age (right now) as they'll ever be.

Fans of Nelson Cruz may have a different opinion. Urrutia got a late start and was injured subsequently. I think we shouldn't dismiss his potential on his age in the same way we would most other 28 year old minor-leaguers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fans of Nelson Cruz may have a different opinion. Urrutia got a late start and was injured subsequently. I think we shouldn't dismiss his potential on his age in the same way we would most other 28 year old minor-leaguers.

Maybe. But it's still true that one's physical ability to play baseball begins to decline in the mid 20s, for most everyone. Knowledge and experience makes up for that (or even overcomes that for a time), to a point. Urrutia may still be gaining in the knowledge and experience part, especially concerning high-level professional baseball. But he's almost certainly plateauing or declining in physical skill and almost nothing (well, legally) can be done to prevent that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe. But it's still true that one's physical ability to play baseball begins to decline in the mid 20s, for most everyone. Knowledge and experience makes up for that (or even overcomes that for a time), to a point. Urrutia may still be gaining in the knowledge and experience part, especially concerning high-level professional baseball. But he's almost certainly plateauing or declining in physical skill and almost nothing (well, legally) can be done to prevent that.

I get what you are saying. Though mid-20s to ''begin the decline'' seems a bit early.

I have heard it argued that certain players who have endured injury, such as Reimold, could be a ''young 31'' because of not playing much over the past few years. He's suffered some injuries that can be career-ending for many. Maybe there is some truth to that; I'm not sure I'm a believer.

As for Urrutia, had he been in the US all these years, I'd probably hold little to no hope for him at 28 y.o. But, with his special circumstances, I think he has a better chance than many of actually being a ''young 28''. I am unwilling to relegate the possibility of a major league career to the scrap heap yet. Heck, Ichiro didn't start his MLB career until he was 27 ( aka his late-20s)...and went on for nine years as one of the league's top performers. It's possible that Henry might have a nice 5 - 6 year run from the age 29 through 34. Or at least I am rooting for him to do that. Time, as they say, will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get what you are saying. Though mid-20s to ''begin the decline'' seems a bit early.

I have heard it argued that certain players who have endured injury, such as Reimold, could be a ''young 31'' because of not playing much over the past few years. He's suffered some injuries that can be career-ending for many. Maybe there is some truth to that; I'm not sure I'm a believer.

As for Urrutia, had he been in the US all these years, I'd probably hold little to no hope for him at 28 y.o. But, with his special circumstances, I think he has a better chance than many of actually being a ''young 28''. I am unwilling to relegate the possibility of a major league career to the scrap heap yet. Heck, Ichiro didn't start his MLB career until he was 27...and went on for nine years as one of the league's top performers. It's possible that Henry might have a nice 5 - 6 year run from the age 29 through 34. Or at least I am rooting for him to do that. Time, as they say, will tell.

The same used to be said of ball players who left the game for a couple of years, and doing military service, they claimed, it allowed their body to rest from playing ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same used to be said of ball players who left the game for a couple of years, and doing military service, they claimed, it allowed their body to rest from playing ball.

People often say Bob Feller would have won well over 300 games if not for the war. I think there's at least an equally good chance that his arm would come off at the shoulder about 1943 from pitching 320-370 innings a year without the break the war gave his arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get what you are saying. Though mid-20s to ''begin the decline'' seems a bit early.

Things like fielding range and running speed, the parts of the game that are more tied to physical ability, peak in one's early-to-mid 20s. A player is probably never faster than the day of his MLB debut. Experience and reps against high-level opponents are what allows a player's overall peak to be as late as 27. In other sports that are more physical-tool based (football non-QB positions, soccer, many Olympic sports like track) I think the peak is years earlier than baseball's 27.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People often say Bob Feller would have won well over 300 games if not for the war. I think there's at least an equally good chance that his arm would come off at the shoulder about 1943 from pitching 320-370 innings a year without the break the war gave his arm.

I find it interesting that Verlender was quoted the other day and said that pictures are too coddled.

http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/03/20/justin-verlander-thinks-pitcher-injuries-come-from-being-coddled/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things like fielding range and running speed, the parts of the game that are more tied to physical ability, peak in one's early-to-mid 20s. A player is probably never faster than the day of his MLB debut. Experience and reps against high-level opponents are what allows a player's overall peak to be as late as 27. In other sports that are more physical-tool based (football non-QB positions, soccer, many Olympic sports like track) I think the peak is years earlier than baseball's 27.

That's likely true and makes sense, especially with wear-and-tear.

I'm thinking early-20s = 20, 21, 22. Mid-20s = 23, 24, 25, 26. Late-20's = 27, 28, 29. Most men finally grow into their bodies at 25. Then there is the learning curve. Overall peak production seems more like 28-30, rather than 24 or 25. And I think the majority of players remain at or near their full-speed through their late-20s. In other words, peak physical ability may not 100% translate to peak MLB production. There are a lot of guys that don't even get the opportunity to play MLB in their mid-20s, getting their shot in their late-20s. David Lough, for example. He's a year older than Urrutia and I haven't seen anyone -- supporters and non-supporters alike -- say that Lough is years past his peak. And he at least had the chance to play MLB between 23 - 26, while Urrutia only started in the minors at 26. Some guys, like Lough, are said to be "late-bloomers." Some guys are "ageless wonders." Many get derailed by injury along the way. Point is that one size doesn't fit all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wondering if Henry isn't in a lot of ways like Hoes. A starting on a last place team like the Astros. Maybe a 4th OF on a mid-range team. In AAA for a playoff contender.

Hard to say. The minor league numbers look a lot different. But how predictive are Cuban stats?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People often say Bob Feller would have won well over 300 games if not for the war. I think there's at least an equally good chance that his arm would come off at the shoulder about 1943 from pitching 320-370 innings a year without the break the war gave his arm.

Considering the numerous examples of legends who blew out their arms by age 30, your point is valid. Feller >300 wins...we'll never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the numerous examples of legends who blew out their arms by age 30, your point is valid. Feller >300 wins...we'll never know.

Too many innings throw before the age of 25, and the arm muscles are still maturing.

Of course, like Ben McDonald, being crazy and closing games, after throwing 9 innings the day before, wasn't exactly the best decision to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...