I've wondered why we track the wear on an arm two different ways. In a game, we go by a pitch count, but in a season we go by innings. Shouldn't we use a pitch count for the entire season? 100 innings for one pitcher could mean a whole lot more pitches than another pitcher.
It seems rare to me that a free agent acquisition ever ends up being worth the contract they receive. Can ya'll remember many that did? Maybe some small ones, but I am thinking the really big ones, like top tier?
So what does all this tell us? Pitching is fickle; don't spend much on it? Stockpile way more arms than you ever think you'll need? Get good insurance for pitchers' contracts?
And if he doesn't, we put him on waivers, no harm, no foul, nothing much lost. If Dan only hits on one out of a dozen of these type of signings, it still makes a big difference.
I wonder how these types of things go down. Did Dan notice this guy and go to Colorado? Were they on the verge of taking him off their roster and called up Dan?
That's only because Buck decided to give them one and start Ubaldo. Should have started Wright and had Worley and Bundy ready to back him up if he got into any trouble.