My whole point of contention with the metric is that you could theoretically be 1st in the league in Stuff+ and Last in the league in BB%, which is why I don't put much strength into it as a metric. Many of the teams that are among the lowest in BB% are not on the list so I was just curious as to how it gave context. It was more an indictment of Stuff+, which is fun, than your post about the O's.