Can_of_corn

A suspicious soul would wonder why they waited.

The season might end next week. Why add payroll?

I'd say not many considering their frequent physicals.

What percentage of MLB players opted in and have underlying conditions that increase vulnerability?

So the Yanks win 12-6?

I thought MLB paid for all of that?

Yankees getting the cold envelope?

Like the repayment of those loans.

On one hand we have an apparent overabundance of caution in the Soto situation while simultaneously having the Marlins take the field knowing they have players testing positive. Fun time.

But it's an elective so it doesn't really matter if you bomb it.

That person needs to be forcibly relocated somewhere that they are not allowed to express opinions.

This is why I've scoffed at the idea that Angelos had to lend the team money.

Why would you make that dubious jump in logic?

Hope you learned your lesson. Yea, no. 1- You purposefully exaggerated the circumstances of Harper's bunt. (0-7 ain't a slump and you know it) 2- You double-downed on your exaggeration instead of bothering to check. 3- You blame ME for pointing out your poor posts. What Harper did was great, glad to see it, but that doesn't mean it's the cure for what is ailing Davis. You can't fix Davis with a few bunts.

He was 0-3 with a walk in the first game. He finished the second game 1 for 2 with two walks so I don't see how he could have been 0-6 or 0-7.

"Get out of a slump"? It was the second game of the season.

The odds that someone on that team or coaching staff is still going to test positive in the next few days is high right?

The O's should forfeit due to safety concerns. #RaceForRocker.

Why would the Orioles agree to this? The Commish leaning on them? The Marlins already violated protocals once.

Haven't seen play like that since 2007.

He going to star as ElAttrache?

Corpses. I suggest you read The Arm.

I mean it has, if you goal is to end extra inning games more quickly.

Kinda sounds like WPA.