My guess is that the language is super clear on the issue and it would be about impossible to tie up in the courts. Otherwise someone would have tried it by now.
4- The owners are mostly concerned with maintaining the status quo and only get involved in the business of other owner's handing of their team in extreme cases.
I think they are perfectly willing to let the status quo continue into the inheritance takes forces a change.
It's a bad look if they have to get involved.
But he doesn't hold all the leverage.
The Ravens are a bigger deal than the O's and he can't actually move the team.
What's his play if the State doesn't budge?
Collage player needing an offensive makeover taken near the top of the draft with the profile of an elite defender with plus speed.
Seems like a fairly apt comparison.
Is it any different than the NFL not letting head coaches wear suits on the sidelines?
The purpose is to try and build the brand.
I disagree with the decision but it could theoretically be called useful.
Leak that they wanted to sign a short term deal instead of a long term deal that was promised as damage control....
Yea, sounds like the type of move John would approve.