Jump to content

Can_of_corn

Plus Member
  • Posts

    114029
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    416

Everything posted by Can_of_corn

  1. It's data. It includes all the variables over a huge accumulation of actual game events. So, did I "pull it out of thin air" or not?
  2. Excuse me? What are you saying exactly? Are you accusing me of making up a random number? Of purposefully presenting false information as accurate data? Is that what is going on here?
  3. Thanks for the heads-up! How did you know I've got him back on /Ignore?
  4. You know what I've never seen in my life? An attempted bunt ending up becoming a double play. All the decades I've been following baseball I don't think it's ever happened. As I've already stated the expected run production from that situation is in excess of one. It isn't smart to play for one.
  5. Run expectancy with runners on first and third and one out is 1.18038. That doesn't scream play for one to me.
  6. Ticks me off they were bunting in the first place. Bunting is for baby showers.
  7. I love it when the other team has to bring in a reliever with a guy on third.
  8. Why would I be at a party? Also what issue do you have with baseball and curling?
  9. I said at the time that I'd put money on Tampa after they lost the one game. Blue Jays had a team meeting and everything.
  10. What does Boras have to do with anything? I think he's a Beverly Hills Sports Council client.
  11. The gambling part is also true. So many props and such can be carefully worked with as long as the parties in question don't get stupid.
  12. I can wait until it's there. I'd rather it be right before it's implemented.
  13. I think certain hitters and pitchers will benefit a ton more than others. I also think that MLB can easily tweak what constitutes a strike to get the walk rate they want.
×
×
  • Create New...