Enos and Brit were talking about Lindor's slow start recently. As part of the discussion Enos said that players tend to swing less in the first month and pitchers can rake advantage of that. I wonder if the Sigbot is arbitraging that with more aggressive PAs?
Santa is chasing out of the zone 10% than last year so far. And he's making contact 6-7% more often while chasing too...
His HH% on 4S is half of what it was last year.
PU% is 17% compared to MLB average of 7%.
1st pitch swing is up 8%. 13% more than league average.
Is it a bat speed thing? He's hitting CH much better than norm.
As a team, the O's seem more aggressive at the plate. Is that messing with what's worked for him the last few years? Hopefully, Santa can get back to being more selective.
He had a cold start in the minors at one point. What do we do with that? Can we get back to complaining about Holliday?
I was on the Ortiz > Westburg wagon. Thought both were going to be good, but like Ortiz' defense better. I'm not surprised or disappointed.
A year or two ago Elias said something to the effect of liking to promote a guy later in the season so he can get a taste of the competition, experience struggles/failure, and have something to work for in the offseason. Maybe that's what we're seeing here.
And yet he struggled early while taking his walks. I'm not saying you're wrong. He could very well add BB% to his bag of tricks. But if this is the best version of himself, then I still consider him elite.
It's just a quibble over an imperative 'need'. Would a higher walk rate help him? All things being equal, absolutely. But what if there's a trade off? Maybe less aggressive swings lead to lower EV and less SLG?
I enjoyed the green fry dip exchange. Ben, the true red-blooded country Cajun, wanted nothing to do with the green fry dip. KB is the chirpa of culinary progress!