Jump to content

Hardball Times: Tommy John


weams

Recommended Posts

http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/12842678/why-tommy-john-surgeries-cease-soon

But ligament is not muscle; it can't be strengthened through exercise as well as muscle can be. It is also not bone, which will adapt to the stress placed upon it. Ligament is just fibrous tissue, and an elite pitcher's ligaments are pretty much the same as yours and mine for one reason: There is little he can do to make his better.

Rick Peterson, the Orioles' director of pitching development, recalls a physicist who approached him after a conference. The physicist had done some calculations. The force exerted on the elbow ligament in the 0.03 of a second of acceleration during a pitch? If a human were exposed to that for 60 seconds, the physicist said, he'd die. So the ligament is pretty tough. It's just not getting any tougher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 253
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Haven't read any of this thread so excuse me... Prior to the real Tommy John, the return rate was 0%. Your career was done. Pretty impressive stat.
78% is a meaningless figure without something to compare to. At first glance I actually think 78% of pretty high because my perception is the rate of return without surgery is likely approaching 0%.

I wonder if anyone knows the rate of return for pitchers who opt not to have surgery after the doctors recommend it. Is the sample size on this even meaningful? Pretty much every pitcher I can recall going down with this injury gets the surgery.

That's what I said!

giggity goooooo :agree:

Although its not really 0%, you can heal from these injuries depending on severity. But the sample size is so low, there is no way to use statistics in a meaningful way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

Happy 72nd birthday to Tommy John, himself.

John was the first person ever to have successful ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction performed on him by the late Dr. Frank Jobe in 1974.

John's career span from 1963-1989 amazingly covered a time when a band called the Beatles was on the verge of exploding on a worldwide level until a guy named Mike Tyson was defending his undisputed world heavyweight title against the likes of Frank Bruno and Carl "The Truth" Williams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

Happy 72nd birthday to Tommy John, himself.

John was the first person ever to have successful ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction performed on him by the late Dr. Frank Jobe in 1974.

John's career span from 1963-1989 amazingly covered a time when a band called the Beatles was on the verge of exploding on a worldwide level until a guy named Mike Tyson was defending his undisputed world heavyweight title against the likes of Frank Bruno and Carl 'The Truth" Williams.

The funny thing is they don't know who the second guy was.

Was a javelin thrower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Keith Law had Yoel Mecias at 87-90 in his last start, velocity has been down all year. Tommy John surgery is not a cure all</p>— Matt Winkelman (@Matt_Winkelman) <a href="

">June 22, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/checking-in-on-three-al-sp-tj-surgery-returnees/

Ignoring those who reinjured themselves or were moved to the bullpen, all of the American League starting pitchers who underwent Tommy John surgery last season have now returned. Typically, I ignore these pitchers ... during their first year back and then analyze their results and velocity when forecasting their performance the following season. But a blanket ignore on every TJ surgery returnee might not be prudent, as evidenced by the superhuman Jose Fernandez, whose performance suggests that he hasn't skipped a beat. So let's take a look at our three.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

http://www.fantasyalarm.com/articles/flowers/23167/how-to-stop-tommy-john-surgery-november-27-2015/

Some people can?t throw 100 pitches without issues arising (health or performance). Others can throw 120 an be fine (Nolan Ryan averaged 127 pitches a game in 1989 the highest officially recorded mark since pitch counts weren?t officially kept until 1988). The fact is all those numbers are arbitrary. Is there any real difference between 95 and 105 pitches? It certainly seems likely that the more pitches a guy throws the more dangerous it is to the health of the player, I get it. Still, what if that pitcher throws 90 percent fastballs versus a guy who only throws 65 percent heaters because he works more off-speed stuff ? should the guy throwing more fastballs be allowed to throw more pitches because there is less stress throwing a fastball instead of a curveball? What if the pitcher is 23 or 29 years old? What if the pitch limit was reached in five or seven innings? See what I?m saying here?

Whatever people believe, guys are getting hurt on a daily basis in baseball, sometimes catastrophically so in situation that requires surgery. What we are doing isn?t working, I think we can all agree with that. What should we do to try and stem the tide of injury? Leave it to the one and only Bill James to throw out an oddball idea that, when you think more about, starts to make more sense than your initial reaction suggests. James suggests that we scrap 5-man rotations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a fascinating situation, at least to me. The most fascinating thing about this situation is that we usually advance and get smarter as time goes on. It seems to me that we are getting worse at handling pitchers despite the millions spent studying the situation. Because of the failure to properly handle pitchers health, I'm to the point where I wouldn't sign any high priced pitchers in free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a fascinating situation, at least to me. The most fascinating thing about this situation is that we usually advance and get smarter as time goes on. It seems to me that we are getting worse at handling pitchers despite the millions spent studying the situation. Because of the failure to properly handle pitchers health, I'm to the point where I wouldn't sign any high priced pitchers in free agency.

It's the velocity. The ligaments and tendons can't handle the strain. Throwing a ball is an inherently unsafe endeavor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...