Jump to content

Fangraphs: Paul Janish


weams

Recommended Posts

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/paul-janish-on-not-hitting/

Paul Janish is your classic good-glove, no-hit infielder. In parts of seven seasons with the Reds, Braves, and currently the Baltimore Orioles, the 32-year-old defensive whiz has slashed .215/.282/.289. Outside of 2010, when he had a .723 OPS and hit five of his seven career home runs, in 200 at bats, Janish has been a non-entity at the dish.

Like most glove-men of his ilk, Janish hit well enough in the minors to reach the big leagues. His bat hasn't translated to the highest level, but success is often a byproduct of extended opportunities, of which he?s received a paucity. It?s a chicken-and-egg dynamic: you need to hit to stay in the lineup, but you need to stay in the lineup to hit.

That isn't to say Janish would be a productive hitter if given a chance to play every day. He might not even be a league-average hitter. Janish realizes that. Even so, he can?t help but wonder if he maybe could have been more than he is: a vacuum cleaner bouncing between Triple-A and a big-league bench, essentially because he's failed to flourish in 1.234 sporatic MLB plate appearances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

< 1 WAR over 7 major league seasons spanning well over 400 games. In nearly 800 games in the minors his slash line is .255/.339/.360 - .699 OPS. I mean...why even write this article? It's not like he's ever hit well in the minors for an extended period of time. Is the original writer just making a case for no-bat, all-glove infielders? He has a 4.3 dWAR. But if his net WAR is essentially zero (year to year)...I just don't get the point? He's a backup SS option, not a starting SS option. Or a utility guy. That's all I got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

< 1 WAR over 7 major league seasons spanning well over 400 games. In nearly 800 games in the minors his slash line is .255/.339/.360 - .699 OPS. I mean...why even write this article? It's not like he's ever hit well in the minors for an extended period of time. Is the original writer just making a case for no-bat, all-glove infielders? He has a 4.3 dWAR. But if his net WAR is essentially zero (year to year)...I just don't get the point? He's a backup SS option, not a starting SS option. Or a utility guy. That's all I got.

That was my thought.... Fangraphs actually took the time to write an article about Paul Janish ?!?!?!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...