Jump to content

Manfred: If MiLB Players Get Raise, Teams will Be Folded


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Perhaps the benevolent Angelos will take it upon himself, a la Jamie Dimon, to toss a few shekels at his lowest paid assets and declare himself a forward thinking and enlightened benefactor for the masses?

Nah, I think he sends them all overseas to live and play in Taiwan, and gives them US dollars to spend... That'll seem like a raise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps the benevolent Angelos will take it upon himself, a la Jamie Dimon, to toss a few shekels at his lowest paid assets and declare himself a forward thinking and enlightened benefactor for the masses?

Nah, I think he sends them all overseas to live and play in Taiwan, and gives them US dollars to spend... That'll seem like a raise.

I think the collective barganing agreement with the Union precludes that being done. The players are not interested in having additional competition subsidized. It's a complex matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just sickens me that the overwhelming opinion is that everyone is entitled to more than they are presently paid

If a young man wants to pursue his dream/love of baseball and play a game for low wages than that is his choice.

Supply/Demand, unless you want to enforce price controls (min and eventually max) wages

Hell Cramer lived in his car for 3 years pursuing his dream of being a hedge fund manager

Baseball should lose it's anti trust exemption

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLB club.

Then I'm trying to understand Manfred's statement. If salaries are paid for by the MILB clubs, then I can see several potentially going out of business if higher salaries were forced on them (similar to several restaurants shutting down in Seattle after the minimum wage was raised to $15). But if the salaries are being paid by the MLB clubs, why would the existence of some of the affiliates be threatened? Are the MLB margins so thin that the big clubs couldn't afford the slightly higher salaries (I think someone compared it to the equivalent of Pedro Alvarez for everyone in a system combined)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then I'm trying to understand Manfred's statement. If salaries are paid for by the MILB clubs, then I can see several potentially going out of business if higher salaries were forced on them (similar to several restaurants shutting down in Seattle after the minimum wage was raised to $15). But if the salaries are being paid by the MLB clubs, why would the existence of some of the affiliates be threatened? Are the MLB margins so thin that the big clubs couldn't afford the slightly higher salaries (I think someone compared it to the equivalent of Pedro Alvarez for everyone in a system combined)?

It's just a threat. Get a raise. Lose your job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All minor leaguers who wish to stay so can opt out of affiliated ball, play independent and negotiate whatever salaries their talents command in the market. They are still eligible to play MLB ball if their attention grab is great enough. It's not like they are banned for all time like it used to be.

Except that MLB changed the draft rules 10 or 15 years ago, so someone who plays in an indy league for five years is treated exactly like someone who is coming out of high school/college. Rights revert to MLB team that drafted you for quite a while. You're not a free agent if you're drafted and decline affiliated ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except that MLB changed the draft rules 10 or 15 years ago, so someone who plays in an indy league for five years is treated exactly like someone who is coming out of high school/college. Rights revert to MLB team that drafted you for quite a while. You're not a free agent if you're drafted and decline affiliated ball.

I never said you were free to come back, I said you could if you were good enough. The Dream of Lew Ford is alive in Portland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just a threat. Get a raise. Lose your job.

It's no different than the Chamber of Commerce stating that X million people will lose their jobs if the minimum wage is increased Y dollars. It's almost certainly not that straightforward, and subject to many externalities. Manfred's statement wouldn't have nearly as much punch phrased like "this will have a minor impact on our bottom lines and we might consider lowering the number of affiliates as a ploy to discourage changes in regulation."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said you were free to come back, I said you could if you were good enough. The Dream of Lew Ford is alive in Portland.

I always wanted to see a college kid jump to Japan/Korea/Mexico, play 3-4 years, then try to come back and hire Frobby to fight MLB. It would be fun to see the straight-faced arguments from MLB about how it was in everyone's best interest to have him continue to be treated as the #37 overall pick by the Padres from four years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always wanted to see a college kid jump to Japan/Korea/Mexico, play 3-4 years, then try to come back and hire Frobby to fight MLB. It would be fun to see the straight-faced arguments from MLB about how it was in everyone's best interest to have him continue to be treated as the #37 overall pick by the Padres from four years ago.

Where is Curt Flood when you need him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...