Orioles Talk
Michael "weams" Williams memorial Orioles chat
21366 topics in this forum
-
- 36 replies
- 4k views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 16 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 32 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 20 replies
- 4k views
-
- 9 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 19 replies
- 7.4k views
-
- 24 replies
- 4.9k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 19 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 899 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.8k views
Orioles News and Information |
|
Daily Organizational Boxscores |
Orioles Prospect Information |
Statistics |
-
Posts
-
By Can_of_corn · Posted
What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move. The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move. -
By Sports Guy · Posted
I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up. Been pretty clear about that. -
By Can_of_corn · Posted
It's hard. You said "the Os were right to fight them in court and why the Nats should have never won.". I want to know why you think that MLB (the Nats) shouldn't have won from a legal standpoint. Or are you just saying they shouldn't have won because it was unfair to the O's? Is that the disconnect? -
By Sports Guy · Posted
🤦♂️ I don’t think you are following what I’m saying. -
By Can_of_corn · Posted
The MASN agreement? That was the bone MLB threw Angelos to avoid court. That has nothing to do with what would have happened if it had gone to court.
-
