I'm not sure I understand the outrage here, nor do I blame Hyde for this. Especially working in tandem with analytically and statistically minded guys like Elias and SigBot, this is a bit over the top.
I don't think anyone here would have a different leadoff man than Mullins when healthy. And I think Adley #2 makes perfect sense. You hope that Mullins can start the game and that Adley and his .400 OBP can get on...then you've got Mullins and Adley on, in a best case scenario.
Maybe you could flip-flop them with Adley leadoff and Mullins #2, but regardless I think those two have cemented themselves as the top two guys in the order.
Not having a clear cut 3rd hitter is more of an indictment on the roster makeup than blaming Hyde for not being able to make a coherent lineup. There's no head and shoulders choice for the third spot.
In regards to winning a game by scoring more runs in 8 innings than our opponents have to in 9, that's a bit over the top. I think it's hard to overcome a lead late in a game, however having 8 innings is still plenty of time to do so. And the Orioles overall W/L record implies that their first inning offensive woes aren't really hurting the team all that much.
In other words, I am sure every team would love to get out to a lead in the first inning, the Orioles probably aren't any different. I think this could be chalked up to one of those flukey baseball things.