If Bitsko was an actual 17 year old can't miss guy he wouldn't have lasted until Tampa's pick.
Good prospect sure, but hardly can't miss. He pitched 33 innings in HS.
I just said it wasn't important.
They said we finished with the fourth best draft. Going in they were in position to have one of the top two drafts (Second pick + Largest pool). I don't consider that nailing a draft.
The Rockies had the 7th biggest pool and picked ninth. I'd say they nailed the draft.
The O's had the sort of draft they should have had given their starting position.
My point was that an arbitrary cutoff, say 1.5M isn't of a lot of value when evaluating the likely impact of draftees. The poster in question didn't even attempt to provide evidence to support their claim. Why 1.5M and not 1.2M or 1.7M?