Can_of_corn

It's the Oriole Way!

You left out the 50 ahhms and 45 umms. ?

I think you are reading a bit too much into his results last spring. Didn't Davis show signs of life last spring?

Isn't he on the 40?

I think you are both overlooking the possibility that he thought the pitching was poor enough here that this was the best shot he had at making a ML roster.

Hey, looks like Kjerstad decided to postpone getting his Masters and will play some ball.

No one is going to play service time games with Baumann and Lowthar.

And yet you have an aversion to crediting more than Holt for Means' success? OK then. I think a large part of Means' success is his desire to improve and his willingness to put in work outside of what is required by the team.

Did you bother to click on the link?

I'm guessing anyone that can buy the O's can buy out the Tides. Or they will stay the AAA affiliate for the length of the contract. Norfolk isn't that far from Nashville.

This article wants to spread the credit around just a bit more than you do. For Orioles' John Means, a lot of work went into the changeup that tore through the Yankees - Baltimore Sun

I already made reference to that.

He's better than at least one member of the 26 man. ?

I'm old for my age.

You are right, I'm only 48, I was rounding up.

I blame Tampa Bay.

Their kids are already in their 50's.

It's got to be organic.

I'm looking forward to the day I get called a Boomer.

They already have Cumberland, they get this guy they only have to get Josh Sborz to complete the set.

We need more zoomer fans fellow white males in their 60's. What do zoomers like? Next thing you know they got meme night going on with the lady yelling at the cat meme. It's got to be organic. Did you see the Rays' Twitter got roasted by Wendy's yesterday?

I don't think they can reverse the trends we are seeing, they just need to adapt to them more efficiently. I don't think chasing millennials and zoomers is going to work.

Yea I saw that. Not sure how that matches up with the rankings (yes I know how you feel about rankings, but it isn't as if Badler isn't ranking them). If you get two guys in the 28-35 range plus other folks below I'm not sure how that can be a top class. Maybe he really likes one of the O's signees? Did you see that Jasson is hitting the ball 117 MPH? I sure how he has some holes in that swing.

I wouldn't say good. This year was better but from what I've read they got two guys that were rated around ~30 in the class? I'm not sure how that qualifies as being well ranked. From what I've seen this years class is huge for the O's but is just putting them on equal footing with the other teams.

A couple things. First off you have to weigh things heavier toward the top. How much can you dock a farm system for not having as many guys, when fully developed, that you can pick off of the waiver wire and have them produce at roughly replacement level? In most cases the top of the system is going to carry the future burden. Secondly, this is the best depth the O's farm has had in quite some time. Are the #15-25 guys in the Red's system actually better prospects? I think KLaw used the lack of International prospects as an excuse to question the depth and lower the ranking. I don't think he wanted to rank a system in the top 10 that didn't have an International presence on their list.