Jim'sKid26

The FB Trout hit was 98 mph but middle-middle. He missed his spot by about a foot. You cannot do that and expect to win at the MLB level. Grayson is young and shows it at times. I think he's uber talented but still rather inexperienced. He's learning how to be a SP at the Big League level. He took his lumps last night. Let's hope it was a learning experience. Not a Jedi yet. Still a very talented padawan.

@RZNJ and @Can_of_corn I appreciate the dialog. I think Jeter could have been a solid defender had he not been asked to play SS. So the quote above, (forgive me for picking a nit), is not entirely accurate. I don't think Jeter was "bad at defense." He was just not +10 at SS. There are a couple of plays that Jeter made that standout to me as showing outstanding defensive skill and situational awareness as well as athleticism. His issue is that he was not gifted with either the arm or the quickness to excel at SS. That coupled with the fact that A-Rod was a much better defensive SS than Jeter when A-Rod joined the MFYs makes me wonder is Jeter might have been a superb 2B or CF but was too stubborn to make the move.

At SS, I agree. I wonder if he had been primarily played at 2B or CF if you would feel the same way. Guess we'll never know.

IMHO defensive prowess at premium positions generally benefits your pitchers to a more significant degree than offensive prowess. So C, CF, SS, 2B are positions that I would be OK with one or two players who profile +10 D/-10 O. I think the corners, (LF, RF, 3B and 1B) are where you can have one or two +10 O/-10 D types. 3B tends to be a corner spot where a stellar defender can change the course of a game or series, however. I also believe that defensive skill is more highly correlated with superb athleticism; whereas offensive skills are less highly correlated with athleticism. In other words, it's rare to see a great defender who is not a great athlete; but there are many excellent hitters who are not very athletic. I think the O's like players who can defend at a very high level. I think they like exceptional athletes who are versatile defensively. They have been fortunate that many of their prospects are superb on both sides of the ball.

Would you prefer "long and hot?"

You ok with no runs in 6.2?

Did you see this? He makes your point extremely well.

Gunnar. Highest reward to risk investment. Scott Boras notwithstanding.

I believe that it is not a specific pitch or pitch-shape that is the culprit. I think it is the desire to throw harder and to spin the ball more. Check out this discussion:

For those of you following at home: Pedantic = "someone who annoys others by correcting small errors, caring too much about minor details, or emphasizing their own expertise especially in some narrow or boring subject matter." Buzzkill = "a person or thing that spoils the mood or the pleasure of others."

I voted over. Bat to ball skills are elite. He will hit. He has defensive value that will show as he gets more comfortable at 2B. His speed and base running also add value. He's at least a 3 fWAR player.

Keep putting his name in the lineup. He's gonna hit.

What do we know about his current catch and throw skills? My recollection is that he was not a defensive wizard as a youngster. Have these improved? I also recall some questions about conditioning and the ability to be behind the plate during the Dog Days of summer.

Big day for Bradish. Here's to 3 IP with 40+ pitches. In PRP we trust....

I've always been wary of the injury bug and its effect on elite catchers. I'm in the camp that says ride him hard and don't extend him. Get as much value out of his time before FA. Spend the money extending Henderson, Holiday and Cowser.

Along this line of thinking, solo HRs happen when you are pounding the strike zone and limiting walks. When you have stuff like Grayson pounding the strike zone makes total sense. These are MLB hitters, after all, you will yield a few long balls. It's best not to have men on base when you do it.

Not entirely sure what yours was either.

There appears to be a reasonable number of " organizational space fillers," at Bowie as well.

I would prefer not to argue semantics with you. Can we agree to disagree?

The direct quote is " We have 4x guys in AAA ready to be promoted... " you can interpret that as you see fit.

Absolutely nothing. The initial assumption of the OP is that there are 4 players ready to be promoted. I disagree. 1) Judging a player by his offensive stat line alone makes for poor decisions. 2) This completely underestimates the challenges of transitioning from AAA to MLB. (nearly every one of the blue chip players that the O's have promoted in the last 2-3 years have struggled in their initial promotion to the MLB) 3) This completely underestimates to skill, experience and defensive prowess of the current players on the O's MLB roster. 4) Holiday is currently making the transition now, as the #1 prospect in baseball, and has struggled. Having one prospect at a time struggle in transition allows for a competitive team at the MLB level. Having 4 prospects struggle all at once could be a disaster.

And you would be wrong.

This makes almost no sense. I mean both were SEC guys who went to Vanderbilt but the similarities stop at that point. Young's claim to fame was an excellent shortened 2020 when he was a freshman. He played 18 games that year. He then played 61 and 56 games at Vandy the next two years. The best he could do at the plate was .253/.344/.559 as a sophomore 2021. When he had 16 HRs and 15 2Bs. It was that year in May that he hurt his shoulder on a head-first slide into second. He ended up with shoulder surgery after the season and has never been the same player since. Bradfield played 3 full seasons of 67, 62 and 62 games. His stat lines are: 2021: .336/.441/.414 2022: .317/.415/.498 with 8 HRs, 10 2Bs and 5 3Bs 2023: .279/.410/.429 with 6 HRs, 13 2Bs and 2 3Bs During those 3 years he stole 47, 46 and 37 bags. Young was planning to leave Vandy at the end of 2022 and transfer to LSU. At the time of his signing with Baltimore he was not considered one of Tim Corbin's top players. He was drafted in the 17th round, as an overslot pick. Many would say a "lottery ticket." Bradfield is a Vanderbilt Baseball icon. He was a human highlight reel in CF. The folks in Nashville still talk about some of the plays he made. He was drafted in the first round (17th player overall). Time will tell on his eventual place in MLB. My point is that they are very different players with very different pedigrees and injury histories. I'm not sure there is much relevance to comparing them.

So the Pythagorean winning percentage would be 72%. So we should be 7-3.

It depends on if they can throw the breaking stuff for strikes. Haven't you heard? The FB is now thrown less than 50% of the time league-wide.