Jump to content

TommyPickles

Plus Member
  • Posts

    969
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TommyPickles

  1. 3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

    Jones had the better prime, Nick was a solid player for a longer time.   Loved it when they played together, they were like ying and yang.

    Very true.

    The only real exception to this being Markakis' 2008 season, he KILLED it that year.  .897 OPS, .306 AVG, 20 homers, 48 2Bs, 10 SB, 7.4 WAR.

  2. Markakis is pulling ahead in one of the great Orioles debates of the last fifteen years:

    Who had the greater MLB career? Adam Jones or Nick Markakis?

    Career rWAR: 

    -Markakis- 34.4

    -Jones- 32.5 

    Top 3 Seasons by rWAR:

    -Markakis- 1. 7.4 (2008), 2. 4.2 (2007), 3. 2.9 (2009)

    -Jones- 1. 4.8 (2013), 2. 4.8 (2014), 3. 4.1 (2012)

    Total Games Played:

    -Markakis- 2129

    -Jones- 1823

    Career OPS:

    -Markakis- .783

    -Jones- .771

    Best Single Season OPS:

    -Markakis- .897 (2008)

    -Jones- .839 (2012)

    All Star Selections:

    -Jones- 5 (2009, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015) 

    -Markakis- 1 (2018)

    Gold Gloves:

    -Jones- 4

    -Markakis- 3

    Silver Slugger:

    -Jones- 1

    -Markakis- 1

     

    I think you could still make an argument either way.  Loved em both as players.

     

     

  3. 1 minute ago, eddie83 said:

    It’s simple. He has pitched well but Akin is considered although not a top prospect to have a higher ceiling. 

    I get that. I'm excited to see Akin and more of the pitching prospects get their shot too.  I'm not trying to argue against that.  It just seems like Eschelman is kind of getting the short stick considering how he's performed.

    Its not like 31-year old Wojo (career 5.65 ERA) has a particularly high ceiling.

  4. Why are people so down on Tom Eschelman? 

    I thought he should have made the team out of Spring Training.  He's got the lowest ERA (2.75) of anyone on the team who has gotten starts. He's younger (26) than Means, Wojo, Cobb, Milone, or Leblanc. He's letting up fewer home runs than just about anyone in this rotation.

    For god's sake, what does this kid need to do to get a shot at being this 2020 team's 5th starter?

    • Upvote 1
  5. I would be THRILLED if Austin Hays matches Adam Jones' career numbers.

    He's got a lot of catching up to do.

    Before he was 25, Adam Jones already had:

    -An All Star nod

    -A Gold Glove

    -50 HRs

    -32 SBs

    -Over 400 games played 

    -Multiple seasons with an OPS+ over 100 (105, 108)

  6. 13 hours ago, MountUrCastle said:

    DH not in org

    1B Mountcastle

    LF not in org

    CF not in org

    RF Diaz

     

    Hope this helps

    So you don't see any of these players on the team in 2022?

    Anthony Santander- 25 years old, not a free agent until 2025, leading the AL in RBIs while playing +defense.

    Renato Nunez- 26 years old, not a free agent until 2025, coming off a 31-homer season, currently has a 133 OPS+

    Austin Hays- 25 years old, not a free agent until 2026, just getting his first real crack at the majors.

     Trey Mancini- 27 years old, not a free agent until 2023, coming off a 35 Homer/.899 OPS season.  Arguably the team leader and most popular player in the organization.

  7. I'm glad people are coming around to 2022 as the goal.  I was previously told that was too early to hope to be competitive.

     

    I think it's going to be:

    DH- Sisco or Nunez (I think the rosters will remain at 28 players indefinitely and the O's will carry three catchers in 2022)

    1B- Mountcastle or Mancini (hard to say what will happen with Mancini, but I think it will be one of these two young men and the other will be gone somehow)

    LF- Santander

    CF- Hays

    RF- Diaz

    • Like 1
  8. It’s not much use comparing 2020 to 2005, since the season and playoff format are so different.

    8 team playoff vs 16 team playoff

    Assuming the Os win the unfinished game against the Nats, they’ll be 10-7. If they finished the season after that with a 19-24 record, they’d be in. The bar is a lot lower than it used to be.

    • Like 1
  9. Could this team make the playoffs in a typical 162-game season with a 10-team playoff format? Absolutely not.

    Could this team go 29-31 and make the 16-team playoff? Yea, I think they could.  

     

    Let's assume they finish their series sweep of the Nats.  They'd be 8-7 after playing 25% of the season.  They could probably go 21-24, or maybe even 20-25, to finish the season and nab an 8 seed.  Then you get the crapshoot of a three-game playoff series...

     

  10. Stewart just doesn't look very athletic to me.  He looked a bit big and awkward when playing this season.   

    He did rack up 6 walks and 2 sac bunts in his 22 PA.

    Excited to see Mountcastle soon.

  11. 4 hours ago, ChuckS said:

    This is going to be a diminished Marlins roster for certain. 

    How will everyone feel about the season if we are 9-3 after 12 games or even 8-4?  Will there start to be talk of playoffs? 

    For me it's getting to the 30 game mark with a record at or better than .500. 

    I think people will start getting excited if the O's sweep the Marlins.  The sixteen-team playoff and 60-game season are such wild cards.  

    In 2019, with the 16-team playoff format, the Rangers (78-84) would have made the playoffs.  That win% (.481) translates to around 28 or 29 wins in a 60-game season. 

    So if the O's start the season 12-3?  They may only need to go 16-29 to finish the season and snag an 8 seed. 

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...