Jump to content

Get to know Yovani Gallardo


weams

Recommended Posts

You are more patient than most. Giving him til the end of the season to get to 90 and then you'll be concerned? C'mon man. What about the 30 starts between now and then? I'd like to see the fastball come back a little sooner than that.

The O's give him time because he's owed the money either way. Simple as that. If you think they value "winning" so much that they'd eat his salary to hand the ball to a MiLer who offers a marginally increased chance of winning Gallardo's starts, you haven't been watching MLB for the last decade+.

See, e.g., Kim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 480
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The O's give him time because he's owed the money either way. Simple as that. If you think they value "winning" so much that they'd eat his salary to hand the ball to a MiLer who offers a marginally increased chance of winning Gallardo's starts, you haven't been watching MLB for the last decade+.

See, e.g., Kim.

Kim is buried on the bench, so not a good comparison. I expect Gallardo to be buried somewhere other than the starting rotation very soon. I'm not advocating eating his salary, but at some point it is a better option than trotting him out there every fifth day when he's this bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kim is buried on the bench, so not a good comparison. I expect Gallardo to be buried somewhere other than the starting rotation very soon. I'm not advocating eating his salary, but at some point it is a better option than trotting him out there every fifth day if he's this bad.

It's a good comparison because they're paying Kim to do nothing but suck up a roster spot that could go to someone more useful if they'd simply release him. Gallardo will have to tank much worse than he already has for the O's to carry an $11+ million reliever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://twitter.com/EddieInTheYard/status/723708408428371968

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Gallardo had shoulder discomfort. Will go back to Baltimore to see team doctors. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a></p>— Eduardo A. Encina (@EddieInTheYard) <a href="

">April 23, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a good comparison because they're paying Kim to do nothing but suck up a roster spot that could go to someone more useful if they'd simply release him. Gallardo will have to tank much worse than he already has for the O's to carry an $11+ million reliever.

Okay, but I was never arguing that he should be released immediately. Kim is not in a position to hurt us the way Gallardo is. He will not stay in the rotation indefinitely if he is pitching like this......whether it is a DL stint or a move to long relief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, but I was never arguing that he should be released immediately. Kim is not in a position to hurt us the way Gallardo is. He will not stay in the rotation indefinitely if he is pitching like this......whether it is a DL stint or a move to long relief.

Well, looks like you're right about the DL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Camden Chat, Gallardo left the game due to shoulder discomfort and will go back to Baltimore

for tests.

After the loss, Orioles manager Buck Showalter told MASN's Gary Thorne that Gallardo experienced shoulder discomfort. "They didn't like the description he was giving us," Showalter said.

..

About his problem, Gallardo himself said on MASN, "My shoulder just didn't feel right. I've never had issues in my career. ... I wasn't able to get the release point. Hopefully it was nothing serious." He added that the problem cropped up when he was warming up in the bullpen tonight.

Not good for Gallardo. It looks like this signing could be exposed as a much bigger mistake than we thought. We signed him knowing his shoulder was messed up and now this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Camden Chat, Gallardo left the game due to shoulder discomfort and will go back to Baltimore

for tests.

Not good for Gallardo. It looks like this signing could be exposed as a much bigger mistake than we thought. We signed him knowing his shoulder was messed up and now this.

I think when Fowler backed out they didn't want to back out on Gallardo. They also wanted a starter and by that time the options were slim.Both deals falling through would not kook good.He is not getting released.Kim makes less for the two years that Gallardo makes in one.Perhaps send Kim and Gallardo to Korea.Orioles picking up some of his salary. 86 also plays better in the KBO.Get her done.Slogan would be instead of Kim C this is Kim G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should wait and see what happens before we start to panic. Once they've run some tests they will have a clearer picture, but it may be something that just requires some rest and rehabilitation. He could end up being the old Yovani Gallardo in the second half.

That said, however, this spotlights the fact that the Orioles were unwilling to spend the cash necessary to take care of their own stated No. 1 priority for the offseason, which was to improve the starting pitching, but instead dawdled around until they could outbid themselves for Chris Davis. As guys such as Cueto went off the board, they waited for Chris. Heck, even that widely-panned Ian Kennedy signing by the Royals is looking pretty good right now. Ultimately they went the cheapskate route for the last guy left and basically had to sign him even with the medical concerns because there just was nobody else. Had they made the rotation their focus, they might have gotten Chris on a shorter deal anyway since it seemed nobody else was beating down a path to his door. And if he ended up somewhere else, they had Trumbo and Walker and eventually Mancini waiting in the wings.

It's a sad thing if it turns out there's a serious issue with Yovani. He seems like a really good guy and he's been a fine pitcher over the years. But it's probably about what Angelos and Duquette deserve for the bassackward way they conducted business this winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...