Jump to content

Gallardo - Roch: deal is DONE (signed)


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 873
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Not really, shoulder problems are still much harder to correct than elbows. Gotta say this is concerning. The Orioles haven't been too wrong on these things in the past.

It could also give us a reason for his bad second half of 2015. Sometimes players are hurt and don't know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really, shoulder problems are still much harder to correct than elbows. Gotta say this is concerning. The Orioles haven't been too wrong on these things in the past.

Yeah, but shoulder "issues" on MRI could be user issues.. hence the second test(ing). If it's normal wear and tear of what you expect at this point.. the deal will be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned a while ago that my credible source told me the Orioles had discussions with Latos' camp, but Latos' camp actually mentioned the Orioles notorious physicals during the discussions "multiple times" and talks cooled after that.

Good.. if a player is scared to take the physical then it probably means they weren't going to pass it.

Being in a position where you have to fill your starting rotation with free agents is a BAD situation to be in and should only be looked at as a last resort... but if you absolutely have to do it, then you better make sure you're not getting damaged goods. It's a different game today with the rate of TJ surgeries through the roof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could also give us a reason for his bad second half of 2015. Sometimes players are hurt and don't know it.

I really people would start looking at game logs and not just flat out stat lines.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/gl.cgi?id=gallayo01&t=p&year=

He got lit up in 4 games in the second half, 3 of them back to back to back after All-Star break. 4 games and none of those 4 games did he give up more then 5 runs. But 20 ER in 19 IP, will take you from a 2.74 ERA to a 3.42 ERA.

It will also kill your WHIP cause in those 4 games he gave up 30 hits and 10BB. That will take you from a 1.32 WHIP to a 1.416 WHIP.

Ask Chris Tillman what 4 games can do to your WHIP and ERA as it was the Blue Jays who destroyed his numbers last year. Tillman pitched a good game opening day... then ran into the buzzsaw that was the Blue Jays, 3 starts against them in a Month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned a while ago that my credible source told me the Orioles had discussions with Latos' camp, but Latos' camp actually mentioned the Orioles notorious physicals during the discussions "multiple times" and talks cooled after that.

...which is why he ended up signing for peanuts with the Chi Sox. He's probably still hurt. If they were confident in his health, things would have played out differently.

“You can never have too much pitching depth,’’ GM Rick Hahn said. “In Mat you bring in a proven veteran guy who when healthy – and the injuries seem to be behind him knock on wood – you bring a proven veteran guy who competes and give you 180-200 quality innings.’’

Not the most ringing endorsement. Knock on wood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really people would start looking at game logs and not just flat out stat lines.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/gl.cgi?id=gallayo01&t=p&year=

He got lit up in 4 games in the second half, 3 of them back to back to back after All-Star break. 4 games and none of those 4 games did he give up more then 5 runs. But 20 ER in 19 IP, will take you from a 2.74 ERA to a 3.42 ERA.

It will also kill your WHIP cause in those 4 games he gave up 30 hits and 10BB. That will take you from a 1.32 WHIP to a 1.416 WHIP.

Ask Chris Tillman what 4 games can do to your WHIP and ERA as it was the Blue Jays who destroyed his numbers last year. Tillman pitched a good game opening day... then ran into the buzzsaw that was the Blue Jays, 3 starts against them in a Month.

Yeah...but he only pitched 6 innings in a game twice after the AS break. That's not very encouraging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...