Jump to content

Gallardo - Roch: deal is DONE (signed)


weams

Recommended Posts

Another twist of the knife from Ken, wow, he hates us.

Yovani Gallardo is the Latest Player Trapped in Contract Limbo with Orioles

(By Ken Rosenthal)

http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/story/baltimore-orioles-yovani-gallardo-deal-physical-injury-peter-angelos-ken-rosenthal-022416

Trapped ...... liked a caged, helpless animal. Thank goodness that he found a way out.

He'll probably be getting something like $30 Million for 2016 and 2017 combined, and then about another $2 Million for 2018 should the Orioles choose to part ways with him when that time comes. I guess that he's no longer eligible for food stamps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 873
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Gallardo's behavior in all of this was not only professional and respectable, but also serves to validate the club's assessment of his physical condition. If there were nothing on his MRI, and absolutely no damage to the shoulder (past or present) then Gallardo and his agent would have been screaming bloody murder. The fact that both sides quietly found a resolution to the issue, means that Gallardo accepted the truth of the physical, and that the Orioles for their part, also recognized this truth, but settled on a level of risk they were comfortable with.

Yeah totally different from Balfour. Wonder if Witt's experience as a player helped here. In any case welcome Gallardo.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gallardo's behavior in all of this was not only professional and respectable, but also serves to validate the club's assessment of his physical condition. If there were nothing on his MRI, and absolutely no damage to the shoulder (past or present) then Gallardo and his agent would have been screaming bloody murder. The fact that both sides quietly found a resolution to the issue, means that Gallardo accepted the truth of the physical, and that the Orioles for their part, also recognized this truth, but settled on a level of risk they were comfortable with.

Well if he pitches three years he gets the same amount of money.Also where was he going No one was going to sign him for one year with a pick attached.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or it could mean the offer on the table is better than anything else he is likely to see at this point.

But probably not better than the outcome of a grievance forcing the league to hold the club to the original deal (which would have been the rightful outcome if there was really nothing to the results of the physical)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how everyone wants to act like Gallardo has some injury history that is cause for concern, like every single other player that ever failed the physical.

It is hilarious. Let's lump this guy in with all the other damaged players, and make it look like he is the same as them!

The O's were right on a guy who MISSED 2 ENTIRE SEASONS just 5 years earlier from major shoulder surgery. Good for them. There should have been concern there.

Gallardo has been the picture of health for darn near a decade. Apples and oranges.

But it is great sitting back reading all this stuff about how his arm is about to fall off.

It is quite entertaining, with literally no basis in reality except for in the minds of fans who want to justify these repeated physical issues.

I am sure that Weams or many of the other posters can tell you without hesitation that I have been pretty down on this management group that we presently have. In fact, I am not on board with the direction that the team took this offseason. But there is no denying that Mr. Angelos has been more than generous with the checkbook this time around, and they have gone out and put together a pretty impressive group for 2016.

The fact that the medical team has issues with something in Gallardo's physical is not something that I am going to question. I am not a Doctor, and even if I were a Dr., I am not privy to Gallardo's medicals. I do not blame the team for protecting themselves against a contract that could leave them with multiple millions owed for zero production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles have a process. Players, agents and media may not like it, but it's their process. Could it lead players away from the Orioles? Not if the Orioles are competitive bidders. In today's MLB economic environment, many teams can't afford to just blow a 3 year, $30M+ contract on a player. I'm all for the due diligence. Maybe if media sources (like Steve Phillips and others) wouldn't leak out signings before they are through, this wouldn't be an issue. The Orioles don't officially announce anything until it's a done deal. Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Orioles?src=hash">#Orioles</a> come up huge again by staying patient in FA market, getting Fowler and Gallardo for only $55 million in guaranteed contracts</p>— Bob Nightengale (@BNightengale) <a href="

">February 25, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...