Jump to content

Dan Duquette: Os to Be Active in Trade Market


weams

Recommended Posts

It's going to come down to if Wilson continues to pitch well and we can fill out the last two spots in the rotation with Wright, Ubaldo and Gallardo. Maybe even Despaigne. If not we're probably going to have to trade for a back end guy and lose guys like...

Hader-Norris trade

Ed Rod-Miller trade

Brault, Tarpley-Snider trade

Davies-Parra trade

J.Cosme-Despaigne trade

With our strong bullpen and a thin market it might be best to just roll with what we have. Would a guy like Andrew Cashner be that much of an improvement over Wright, Ubaldo and Gallardo? Plus we have to pay him and give up prospects. There's still 7-8 weeks before the deadline and hopefully the market will start to develop more once some more teams realize they are out of it.

Don't forget

Devin Jones-Brad Brach trade

Steve Clevinger-Mark Trumbo trade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 407
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Obviously, a lot is going to depend on the next 3-5 weeks and how our starting rotation performs. My hope is that Walker, Wright, and Gallardo perform so well that we don't have to make a trade. How about another reliever? Sean Doolittle might be expensive because he's not a rental but he might be a good fit.

Interesting thought. As a starter? or reliever?

I think maybe targeting someone in long relief doing well as a starter might be creative way of finding some SP depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting thought. As a starter? or reliever?

I think maybe targeting someone in long relief doing well as a starter might be creative way of finding some SP depth.

Maybe make Fister come pitch in Baltimore. Wouldn't that be a kick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DD screwed us bad on the SP front. Terrible. Everything he touches falls to crap in the starting pitching front.

How do we right the ship?

We probably have to trade one of Schoop or Trumbo.

Would you do it? Who would you target?

Do you trust DD to execute?

We ALL love Trumbo and Schoop. But Trumbo always tends to tail off and can he really stay this hot?

I much rather keep Schoop, but we need pitching and I am open to anything because right now, the Blue Jays will win the division IMO. Best pitching in the AL East right now and they will probably be big movers at the deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DD screwed us bad on the SP front. Terrible. Everything he touches falls to crap in the starting pitching front.

How do we right the ship?

We probably have to trade one of Schoop or Trumbo.

Would you do it? Who would you target?

Do you trust DD to execute?

We ALL love Trumbo and Schoop. But Trumbo always tends to tail off and can he really stay this hot?

I much rather keep Schoop, but we need pitching and I am open to anything because right now, the Blue Jays will win the division IMO. Best pitching in the AL East right now and they will probably be big movers at the deadline.

Reading this, one would think you step into a time machine, and this is 2008 and the team is 20 games under .500.

If DD is so bad, how do you trust him now, to make the right trade for SP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way I'd trade Schoop for anything other than a #1 or #2 starter. He's an outstanding 2nd baseman, and I believe his offensive production will be similar in another year or two to what we're seeing from Machado (though maybe not quite as high of an OBP - he is a free swinger).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that the only way to win is to trade away currently valuable pieces. The other team is trying to win, too, or at least gain an advantage in the trade. Trumbo is out of contract in four months, you're not getting a top pitcher back for that unless he's also out of contract or has lots of warts. Schoop would open a hole on both offense and defense for years to come. You hope to stabilize the rotation while detracting from the team on the other side.

The only way you're a good bet to improve is to trade away something that's not currently adding value to performance for something that is. So that's a) prospects and/or b) money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FYI, this was discussed at length here, including Givens as a trade piece.

I was the to originally suggest Givens some time ago:) I love Givens, but you trade from strength. Right now, that is Trumbo, Schoop (less) and the bullpen (Givens). I think Wright can do a superb job replacing Givens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading this, one would think you step into a time machine, and this is 2008 and the team is 20 games under .500.

If DD is so bad, how do you trust him now, to make the right trade for SP?

To be honest, I don't trust him. I have said I would keep him through the end of the year and promote Brady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would we get back, and how would it offset the loss of production from making Flaherty our everyday 2B or Rickard our everyday RF?

I don't see how you can improve the team fundamentally by trading off guys who are contributing right now for other guys who could contribute right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would we get back, and how would it offset the loss of production from making Flaherty our everyday 2B or Rickard our everyday RF?

I don't see how you can improve the team fundamentally by trading off guys who are contributing right now for other guys who could contribute right now.

Assume our borderline negligent GM has the ability to rip off other teams at any moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would we get back, and how would it offset the loss of production from making Flaherty our everyday 2B or Rickard our everyday RF?

I don't see how you can improve the team fundamentally by trading off guys who are contributing right now for other guys who could contribute right now.

I think selling high on Trumbo makes a lot of sense. Depends what you can get though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...