Jump to content

Manfred: If MiLB Players Get Raise, Teams will Be Folded


weams

Recommended Posts

I'm not arguing with the reasons people go play ball for $1000/month, just the post I was quoting that said a lot of players end up ahead of their non-athlete peers. I think 80+% of the guys on the Keys will earn less in baseball than whatever their buddies in HS did for a living during those years. But that's what they want to do. It's fine, up to the point where they're bumming rooms for a place to sleep and having trouble affording healthy food.

I agree with that. I don't think anyone gets into pro ball because that's how they expect to make their living all of their life. I think most guys give it a shot, then if they aren't good enough, they go do something else. I agree that nutrition should be improved and that teams should be required to provide meals to the home and away teams, but at the same time, I haven't seen too many fat baseball players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I agree with that. I don't think anyone gets into pro ball because that's how they expect to make their living all of their life. I think most guys give it a shot, then if they aren't good enough, they go do something else. I agree that nutrition should be improved and that teams should be required to provide meals to the home and away teams, but at the same time, I haven't seen too many fat baseball players.

Colon, Sabathia and Fielder excluded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't mean to get too political....and I will stop aftetr this post.....but that is my point, everyone's livable wage is different. One person may be happy with $8 per hour someone else at $15, another at $50. Hard to set a livable minimum when there is no agreement on what is livable.

At the end of the day, if a person choose to live the lifestyle of a minor leaguer he understands what he's getting into. 1000s of young men choose to take on this lifestyle on order for a chance to make it to the major leagues. Even if they don't make it they can say they were a professional baseball player, something just about every young baseball players aspires to. I've been around the minors at all levels and I would say the vast majority of the players are happy to be doing what they are doing. In this entitled generations we're starting to see complaints, but at the end of the day, if you don't like it, do something else because ten guys will fight to take your place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Livable wage is also very dependent on the part of the country your are in. An apartment for someone in Long Island is going to be significantly higher that for someone living in West Texas. If a significant portion of salary goes to having a place to live then economically it's in the best interest of a minor leaguer to play in the location with the lowest overall standard of living as more money can be allocated to better food, savings, etc.

Don't mean to get too political....and I will stop aftetr this post.....but that is my point, everyone's livable wage is different. One person may be happy with $8 per hour someone else at $15, another at $50. Hard to set a livable minimum when there is no agreement on what is livable.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Livable wage is also very dependent on the part of the country your are in. An apartment for someone in Long Island is going to be significantly higher that for someone living in West Texas. If a significant portion of salary goes to having a place to live then economically it's in the best interest of a minor leaguer to play in the location with the lowest overall standard of living as more money can be allocated to better food, savings, etc.
Yeah. Let's not debate the economics of a living wage. The idea here is this in not meant to be something that you can make living at. Now should it be? That is an interesting conversation right there. These "kids" are living a dream, like my rock star nephew. Some hit it big as well. The entire world of minor league baseball is all about getting your one shot. And not blowing it. Tony really does know what he is talking about here.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. Let's not debate the economics of a living wage. The idea here is this in not meant to be something that you can make living at. Now should it be? That is an interesting conversation right there. These "kids" are living a dream, like my rock star nephew. Some hit it big as well. The entire world of minor league baseball is all about getting your one shot. And not blowing it. Tony really does know what he is talking about here.

No arguments here, was just pointing out that the term "livable wage" is relative to where you live and is not something that MLB, the US Gov't nor anyone else can set a one size fits all solution to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No arguments here, was just pointing out that the term "livable wage" is relative to where you live and is not something that MLB, the US Gov't nor anyone else can set a one size fits all solution to.

I have no problem with folks doing real jobs having a floor no matter where they live. I have no interest in living as part of the other world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is supply and demand. No one is paying big tv contracts to watch minor league players. Major league players have leverage to get the big bucks because they are the best of the best. Just about all of the players in the minors either got a free college education or had the chance to get one. Most of us mere mortals never get that opportunity. They choose to chase the dream. If you are Manny Machado then you don't spend a whole lot of time eating Subway (setting aside his signing bonus).

Nobody is paying to watch Ubaldo Jimenez either, and he makes $15 million a year. It's never as simple as merely "supply and demand". It's also about influences of unions, law and whatever the league thinks it can get away with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody is paying to watch Ubaldo Jimenez either, and he makes $15 million a year. It's never as simple as merely "supply and demand". It's also about influences of unions, law and whatever the league thinks it can get away with.

It's as simple as supply and demand. Try as you may, you'll likely not win Wimbelton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

College sports is like playing for the Soviets. You do it for the love of your country/school while they make $ off you. Unlike the Soviets, you at least get free education out of it, and if the program is clean; then you actually know a thing or two coming out of college

Please, the vast majority of colleges make no money on their sports programs, and even the ones that do make no money on most of their sports programs. The players that do make their colleges a lot of money are usually paid in the form of a free education and free room and board. Payment does not have to come in the form of a salary. If these students start getting a salary they can say goodbye to getting a free education, which in the long run is far more valuable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • They also smacked him around for 7 ER on 9 H in 1.2 innings. He can be beaten, though he certainly had a great September.  
    • I understand why posters would want to avoid Skubal in a game 1, but the Royals starters are not going to be a cakewalk. Probably a deeper starting staff with Ragans, Lugo and Wacha.
    • Interesting article …. Pretty surprising stat with all the guys that we lost to injury       https://www.masnsports.com/blog/orioles-made-it-through-rough-t
    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...