Jump to content

Manfred: If MiLB Players Get Raise, Teams will Be Folded


weams

Recommended Posts

Back to the main point, I don't see how being a minor league ballplayer is like having an internship or walking around dressed like Mickey Mouse. Ballplayers have skills. They may not be as skilled as Mike Trout or Jose Fernandez, but they have skills nonetheless. Minor League teams make money off of their skills, so it's not like they are on the water polo team at UCLA or the rowing team at Harvard.

But the minor league teams don't make money off their skills. They make money off of having 20 guys dressed as a baseball team kind of trying to win while providing a family atmosphere and a conduit for $7 hot dogs and $9 beers. When the #2 prospect in baseball takes the mound for the Hickory Crawdads most of the crowd is more concerned about getting their kid a wristband for $6 to play at the playground down the third base line. I assume that affiliated BaySox and unaffiliated BlueCrabs don't have significant revenue differences because of the talent or identity of the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Back to the main point, I don't see how being a minor league ballplayer is like having an internship or walking around dressed like Mickey Mouse. Ballplayers have skills. They may not be as skilled as Mike Trout or Jose Fernandez, but they have skills nonetheless. Minor League teams make money off of their skills, so it's not like they are on the water polo team at UCLA or the rowing team at Harvard. I think the main problem is that they are young and most of the lesser talented ones are expected to understand baseball is not in their long term future. These players are all really young. Young people are less likely to fight for better wages, or unionize and are more likely to change jobs. The league takes advantage of this. Just like the internship lawsuits of a year or two ago it looks like the next phase for this is to be decided in the courts.

Oh I'm not arguing for low wages/treating this as a internship. I think minor leaguers should be paid more, I was just referring to some of the posts comparing Disney workers and interns to minor leaguers. I think the kids in the costumes make a pretty darn good hourly wage. More than many minor leaguers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to the main point, I don't see how being a minor league ballplayer is like having an internship or walking around dressed like Mickey Mouse. Ballplayers have skills. They may not be as skilled as Mike Trout or Jose Fernandez, but they have skills nonetheless. Minor League teams make money off of their skills, so it's not like they are on the water polo team at UCLA or the rowing team at Harvard. I think the main problem is that they are young and most of the lesser talented ones are expected to understand baseball is not in their long term future. These players are all really young. Young people are less likely to fight for better wages, or unionize and are more likely to change jobs. The league takes advantage of this. Just like the internship lawsuits of a year or two ago it looks like the next phase for this is to be decided in the courts.
But the minor league teams don't make money off their skills. They make money off of having 20 guys dressed as a baseball team kind of trying to win while providing a family atmosphere and a conduit for $7 hot dogs and $9 beers. When the #2 prospect in baseball takes the mound for the Hickory Crawdads most of the crowd is more concerned about getting their kid a wristband for $6 to play at the playground down the third base line. I assume that affiliated BaySox and unaffiliated BlueCrabs don't have significant revenue differences because of the talent or identity of the players.

It has nothing to do with age. Or skilz. It has to do with whether folks will pay billions to watch them juggle their chainsaws or not. There is no discrimination here because the youngsters are will to abide by the rules to have their shot at the Mickey costume and not the Goofy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to the main point, I don't see how being a minor league ballplayer is like having an internship or walking around dressed like Mickey Mouse. Ballplayers have skills. They may not be as skilled as Mike Trout or Jose Fernandez, but they have skills nonetheless. Minor League teams make money off of their skills, so it's not like they are on the water polo team at UCLA or the rowing team at Harvard. I think the main problem is that they are young and most of the lesser talented ones are expected to understand baseball is not in their long term future. These players are all really young. Young people are less likely to fight for better wages, or unionize and are more likely to change jobs. The league takes advantage of this. Just like the internship lawsuits of a year or two ago it looks like the next phase for this is to be decided in the courts.

This is not like the internship deal. These are not jobs that they are training towards. There are seven hundred of them. It's like wearing a crown in daily life in terms of likelihood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the minor league teams don't make money off their skills. They make money off of having 20 guys dressed as a baseball team kind of trying to win while providing a family atmosphere and a conduit for $7 hot dogs and $9 beers. When the #2 prospect in baseball takes the mound for the Hickory Crawdads most of the crowd is more concerned about getting their kid a wristband for $6 to play at the playground down the third base line. I assume that affiliated BaySox and unaffiliated BlueCrabs don't have significant revenue differences because of the talent or identity of the players.

This is largely accurate. My company (a large commercial insurance broker) handles the MLB workers compensation program (I don't work on the program). I can say with relative certainty that minor league operations run on the smallest of profit margins. Further, the players, who belong to and are paid by the big league club, are mere tenants in most stadiums, which are owned by various outside interests, if not the cities in which they play. What the players get paid and what the concession workers get paid are often two very distinct decisions.

But it would also be true that if a minor league team had - say Bryce Harper - on its roster, the crowds would almost certainly be larger, and that might put more money not in the MLB owner's pocket, but in the concessionaires and stadium owners pocket, so there is some incentive to have talented kids on the field.... Anyhoo...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is largely accurate. My company (a large commercial insurance broker) handles the MLB workers compensation program (I don't work on the program). I can say with relative certainty that minor league operations run on the smallest of profit margins. Further, the players, who belong to and are paid by the big league club, are mere tenants in most stadiums, which are owned by various outside interests, if not the cities in which they play. What the players get paid and what the concession workers get paid are often two very distinct decisions.

But it would also be true that if a minor league team had - say Bryce Harper - on its roster, the crowds would almost certainly be larger, and that might put more money not in the MLB owner's pocket, but in the concessionaires and stadium owners pocket, so there is some incentive to have talented kids on the field.... Anyhoo...

Thank you. I have very slight knowledge about this as well. I like that there is minor league baseball available to fans. From a selfish standpoint. I live in the city that had Bryce and Strasburg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is largely accurate. My company (a large commercial insurance broker) handles the MLB workers compensation program (I don't work on the program). I can say with relative certainty that minor league operations run on the smallest of profit margins. Further, the players, who belong to and are paid by the big league club, are mere tenants in most stadiums, which are owned by various outside interests, if not the cities in which they play. What the players get paid and what the concession workers get paid are often two very distinct decisions.

But it would also be true that if a minor league team had - say Bryce Harper - on its roster, the crowds would almost certainly be larger, and that might put more money not in the MLB owner's pocket, but in the concessionaires and stadium owners pocket, so there is some incentive to have talented kids on the field.... Anyhoo...

Bryce and Stephen got Huge moo-la to come play in my little city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the minor league teams don't make money off their skills. They make money off of having 20 guys dressed as a baseball team kind of trying to win while providing a family atmosphere and a conduit for $7 hot dogs and $9 beers. When the #2 prospect in baseball takes the mound for the Hickory Crawdads most of the crowd is more concerned about getting their kid a wristband for $6 to play at the playground down the third base line. I assume that affiliated BaySox and unaffiliated BlueCrabs don't have significant revenue differences because of the talent or identity of the players.

I doubt the crowd is there just see any old baseball team. It's not like they're paying to watch Homer Simpson play beer league softball. The fans know not all of the guys on these teams will one day play in the majors but they know some of them will, and they watch these teams knowing one or two or more will make it. The logic that only a handful of "maybes" should make millions as bonus babies and that all the others should get peanuts is bs. We all know that many of the bonus babies never make it in the majors and occasionally some of the "never gonna make it" types end up being Mike Piazza. This is only one reason there should be more equitable compensation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not like the internship deal. These are not jobs that they are training towards. There are seven hundred of them. It's like wearing a crown in daily life in terms of likelihood.

Of course it's a job some are training toward. Just because not everyone in the mail room at JP Morgan will one day be CEO (or even A VP) of the company doesn't mean only some of the guys in the mail room should get paid a living wage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course it's a job some are training toward. Just because not everyone in the mail room at JP Morgan will one day be CEO (or even A VP) of the company doesn't mean only some of the guys in the mail room should get paid a living wage.

Is there a direct path from the mail room to the board room based on skill?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is largely accurate. My company (a large commercial insurance broker) handles the MLB workers compensation program (I don't work on the program). I can say with relative certainty that minor league operations run on the smallest of profit margins. Further, the players, who belong to and are paid by the big league club, are mere tenants in most stadiums, which are owned by various outside interests, if not the cities in which they play. What the players get paid and what the concession workers get paid are often two very distinct decisions.

But it would also be true that if a minor league team had - say Bryce Harper - on its roster, the crowds would almost certainly be larger, and that might put more money not in the MLB owner's pocket, but in the concessionaires and stadium owners pocket, so there is some incentive to have talented kids on the field.... Anyhoo...

The fact that minor league teams run on the smallest profit margins is irrelevant if it's the major league clubs paying millions of dollars to sign the top draft picks and the international free agents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a direct path from the mail room to the board room based on skill?

Whether there is or isn't is not the point in this case. The point is you have an idea which players could make it to the majors, but you don't really know until it happens. Then there is the separate debate of whether all workers deserve a minimum wage -- a separate debate that is part economic and part moral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt the crowd is there just see any old baseball team. It's not like they're paying to watch Homer Simpson play beer league softball.

Most of the crowd really is just there to watch any old team. At Aberdeen, it's a bunch of extremely green players making tons of errors. My parents don't go because they want to watch baseball; they want baseball to be the background of a friends and family outing. Because it's cheap and convenient, they can get crabs on the patio, and they can enjoy the summer. This is the reality of most people that go to minor league games. It's not because they wanted to see Cody Sedlock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the crowd really is just there to watch any old team. At Aberdeen, it's a bunch of extremely green players making tons of errors. My parents don't go because they want to watch baseball; they want baseball to be the background of a friends and family outing. Because it's cheap and convenient, they can get crabs on the patio, and they can enjoy the summer. This is the reality of most people that go to minor league games. It's not because they wanted to see Cody Sedlock.

Aberdeen is just fantastic. The players might be like Cal someday. Whatever their name is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...