Jump to content

My Opening Day Odyssey


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

o

 

Although I was not at today's game in Baltimore, I nonetheless had a very peculiar experience in my quest (and determination) to watch the Orioles' first contest of the season against the Blue Jays.

It was 2:30 PM, half an hour before the first pitch, and all of a sudden my Internet service went out. I called the cable company, and they said that it should be resolved by 6:23 PM ......... 6:23 PM ??? The game will be over by then !!!

 

So ........ I was thinking of what sports bar I could go to in order to watch the game AND keep track of Kevin Gausman's pitch-count for each and every inning that he was in the game. Brewster probably has a couple of sports bars, but because of the fact that I had no Internet service, and I couldn't go on line to see where they were. The closest sports bar THAT I KNEW ABOUT was 20 minutes away, on the border of Danbury, CT and Bethel, CT.

 

So I got in my car at about 2:45 PM, and hoped that I could get there in time for the first inning. Since Danbury, CT is Metsland and Yankeeland, all of their TV  sets were on the Mets-Braves game, so I had to ask one of the waitresses if she could turn on the Orioles-Blue Jays game. She did, although I had to settle to listening to the Mets-Braves game audio. Lo and behold, when she got the channel for the game turned on, Gausman was about to face the 2nd batter in the top of the 1st inning after he had ceded a single to the first man that he faced. So, I simply started counting all of Gausman's pitches from that point onward for each individual inning, and subtracted that from his overall total after he was removed from the game to know how many pitches that Gausman had thrown to the first batter of the game that singled.

 

Mission accomplished. 0 :skeletor:

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, callahan09 said:

 

Sounds kind of exciting, actually.

Curious, do you not have a smartphone that can allow you to search for a sports bar?

 

o

 

No, I don't.

I just have a regular cell phone.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, schittenden said:

 

What is this "regular cell phone" of which you speak?

 

o

 

I don't know. I just use it for calls made and received, and for leaving and receiving messages. It doesn't take pictures, and I don't have internet access on it. I just buy a phone which takes the same sim card as the previous one when I need a new one, which is pretty rare. My previous cell phone actually survived the washing machine. I continued to use it for several more years before it finally died.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...