The obvious answer is they took guys who were less than to save money. Now that's malpractice... and not necessarily my perspective, but I'm pretty sure that's the contention.
For me it all boils down to Cowser and whether or not you believe Elias. When you start things off at #5 with a guy most of the talking heads had outside of their top 10 and then you pay him $1MM underslot, there are justifiable questions. Especially when you look at the remainder of their picks. Not a whole lot of bonus baby opportunities.