Jump to content

Gallardo - Roch: deal is DONE (signed)


weams

Recommended Posts

I've got plenty of posts here where I'm pretty harsh on the management of the club, so I'm not in the absolute homer camp. But, that piece from Rosenthal is pure trash. He's all over the map with his crap. Why would Gallardo be less appealing if he goes back on the market if the O's physical is, as he claims, a farce?

Man, this is spot on. He talks up the grievance with Balfour alot in the article. Wanna know why it hasn't advanced anywhere? Because he lost out on a 2/15 contract with the Orioles and still signed a 2/12 contract with the Rays. The grievance is only worth a maximum of $3MM! When you factor in legal fees and the low probability of winning it (because, you know, Balfour was actually hurt...conveniently glossed over), it's not even worth pursuing.

Either the Orioles are a running a scam, like he alleges, and other teams know so the players aren't actually hurt. Or the Orioles are correctly identifying when players are hurt or have medical concerns that aren't priced into their perceived market value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 873
  • Created
  • Last Reply
But you lose the pick for even less years.So Oriole doctors can predict in the third year issues will prop up.They are amazing.

The 4th year option on Gallardo's original contract was very unlikely to be exercised, even if he is healthy the next 3 years. It had almost zero value. The third year option in the current contract is much more likely to be exercised. In either case, at his ability, age, and salary, he's likely to only be worth having on the team for 3 years. And of course, it's not about predicting the exact year the injury will be, it's about lowering the overall guaranteed money. Now we have the option to cut bait after 2 years if he gets hurt or falls apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rosenthal's revised piece is still trash. Contains a quote from a player rep who essentially says this is why the Orioles should always be a player's last choice.

Agreed. He has no idea how valid the issues are and it's a stretch to say that Angelos is just meddling. This deal isn't big enough to be meddling over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. He has no idea how valid the issues are and it's a stretch to say that Angelos is just meddling. This deal isn't big enough to be meddling over.

Frank Wren, who he quotes, was fired for gross negligence last century. Jim Duquette has no idea what discussions Mike Flanagan and Peter Angelos had alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sir Loin, as always, thanks for the accurate info you have been providing. I never doubted you once. I hope you will continue to be a source of great and timely info for all of us O's diehards moving forward. Major props to you!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rosenthal's revised piece is still trash. Contains a quote from a player rep who essentially says this is why the Orioles should always be a player's last choice.

Rosenthal's getting bashed hard on Twitter due to it, too. Total jack-leg move by him. We get it, Ken. You can't let go of your grudge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...