Jump to content

Miguel Gonzalez Appreciation Tread


weams

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

o

Other than trying to get some anger going ...... what is the point of this? The people that were glad about him getting released were few and far between. 

o

o

 

People may be wanting  to blow off some steam because of the condition of the Orioles' starting pitching as of late.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply

 I don't know, but I think I can see the point in discussing this, especially if we are still considering extending Tillman.

 And it's not like he starting a whole new thread about it just bumped one for discussion, not sure what the problem is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, murph said:

Ok.

So, I hadn't looked at him this year as of yet and just did, wow he is really off to a great start.  He is definitely making his release look foolish.

 

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/g/gonzami03.shtml

He's still beating the Yankees for us. Seems like he'd have a hard time breaking the Os rotation six deep. Right? He would not have an option this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, weams said:

He's still beating the Yankees for us. Seems like he'd have a hard time breaking the Os rotation six deep. Right? He would not have an option this year. 

Agreed, but still would be a nice problem to have!  And I imagine his year will be more consistent over all than Ubaldo, but yes I know with the money involved Ubaldo is not going anywhere.  Just hope he strings together some more starts like his last. 

 

I am thrilled Gonzo regardless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, murph said:

Agreed, but still would be a nice problem to have!  And I imagine his year will be more consistent over all than Ubaldo, but yes I know with the money involved Ubaldo is not going anywhere.  Just hope he strings together some more starts like his last. 

 

I am thrilled Gonzo regardless. 

I do not believe he will have a better season from this point forward than Ubaldo. No. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, murph said:

 I don't know, but I think I can see the point in discussing this, especially if we are still considering extending Tillman.

 And it's not like he starting a whole new thread about it just bumped one for discussion, not sure what the problem is. 

First, before the injury 4/50 for Tillman would have been a bargain, and was never going to happen.

Second, many guys had seasons like Miguel did and then fell off the planet fast. Rodrigo Lopez is one example. Does letting Miguel go look bad now? Yeah. But I don't remember too many people saying that then.

Miguel Gonzalez will probably get a 4/50 m deal himself now when he's a FA. Would many be clamoring to give him that kind of deal? I think if Tillman is an Oriole next year, he took the QA. The Orioles won't be giving him a longterm imo.

 

My original comment actually did have something to do with the posters point. Gonzalez was never given a chance until the Orioles came calling. Now they are being called out for keeping Tillman and releasing Gonzalez? Tillman was the ace of the staff who had a bad year. Gonzalez was a journeyman who seemed like the magic wore off. Many teams make these same type of moves.

 

It's over and done now. Why harp on it? Hey, let's trade Sisco and get Miguel back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dark Helmet said:

First, before the injury 4/50 for Tillman would have been a bargain, and was never going to happen.

Second, many guys had seasons like Miguel did and then fell off the planet fast. Rodrigo Lopez is one example. Does letting Miguel go look bad now? Yeah. But I don't remember too many people saying that then.

Miguel Gonzalez will probably get a 4/50 m deal himself now when he's a FA. Would many be clamoring to give him that kind of deal? I think if Tillman is an Oriole next year, he took the QA. The Orioles won't be giving him a longterm imo.

 

My original comment actually did have something to do with the posters point. Gonzalez was never given a chance until the Orioles came calling. Now they are being called out for keeping Tillman and releasing Gonzalez? Tillman was the ace of the staff who had a bad year. Gonzalez was a journeyman who seemed like the magic wore off. Many teams make these same type of moves.

 

It's over and done now. Why harp on it? Hey, let's trade Sisco and get Miguel back.

I get what your saying, but it is something to discuss IMO. 

If Gonzo gets 4/50 I will be shocked, but I guess if he pitches this well all year, someone may give it to him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dark Helmet said:

First, before the injury 4/50 for Tillman would have been a bargain, and was never going to happen.

Second, many guys had seasons like Miguel did and then fell off the planet fast. Rodrigo Lopez is one example. Does letting Miguel go look bad now? Yeah. But I don't remember too many people saying that then.

Miguel Gonzalez will probably get a 4/50 m deal himself now when he's a FA. Would many be clamoring to give him that kind of deal? I think if Tillman is an Oriole next year, he took the QA. The Orioles won't be giving him a longterm imo.

 

My original comment actually did have something to do with the posters point. Gonzalez was never given a chance until the Orioles came calling. Now they are being called out for keeping Tillman and releasing Gonzalez? Tillman was the ace of the staff who had a bad year. Gonzalez was a journeyman who seemed like the magic wore off. Many teams make these same type of moves.

 

It's over and done now. Why harp on it? Hey, let's trade Sisco and get Miguel back.

I agree with most of what you say here, but  there is zero chance that Gonzo gets anything remotely close to a 4/50 deal. He will be lucky to get a 2/17 deal. And that might even be generous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • We played all our Saturday games at home at 4pm. That should help us.  I don’t know if that was the full reason we made the switch this year, but it had to factor in. We didn’t do so well in the day games last year in the playoffs.  Also, don’t be surprised to see McCann get a big hit in game 1 and possibly just start this entire series versus the speedster Royals.  Let’s go. We owe these “guys” big time paybacks even if it’s 10 years later. 
    • They also smacked him around for 7 ER on 9 H in 1.2 innings. He can be beaten, though he certainly had a great September.  
    • I understand why posters would want to avoid Skubal in a game 1, but the Royals starters are not going to be a cakewalk. Probably a deeper starting staff with Ragans, Lugo and Wacha.
    • Interesting article …. Pretty surprising stat with all the guys that we lost to injury       https://www.masnsports.com/blog/orioles-made-it-through-rough-t
    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...