Jump to content

vs. RED SOX, 6/1


Sessh

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 926
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Oh this is gonna be fun..

Ra?l Mondes? tested positive in 2003. His son is no different then him.

Matt Stairs used adderall.

Brian Giles went from an average hitter to a bomb machine and when testing started taking place in 2003 his numbers fell off a cliff.

Jim Wynn hit 30 plus 3 times in his career and averaged 25 homer a season..

Rogers Hornsby was close to 6ft and age 26 playing in Sportsman's Park (the Camden Yards of the 1920s).

Al Simmons 5'11, 190lbs, Adrian Beltre 5'11 220, Willie Horton 5'11 209 (and played in Detriot and did it only once), Dick Allen 5'11 190.

Gary Sheffield is an admitted steroid user.

Mel Ott played at the Polo Grounds (you could spit down the lines and clear the fences there, 279ft in LF and 258ft in RF).

Most of the guys you listed were big boys as in 5'10 or taller for the periods they played. Especially in the era's they played where some ball park fences down the line were short of 300ft.

Just stop it, really. Maybe Giles' numbers went down because he was 32, you know, typically when players fall into decline. You must be stretch armstrong with the reaching you are doing. Player X does good but doesn't have a prototypical HR hitter build = cheater. Bad logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They did a piece on him on MLB radio. The analyst stated that Kim was hitting on his front leg and was lunging at everything and could not get to the fastball. Stated the O's worked with him on staying on his back leg.

If Coolbaugh did that, then great. Hard to see how he could have been successful even in the KBO with that kind of major swing deficit. If he had it in Korea, then our scouting was poor. If he just got into a temporary bad habit coming over here that he has corrected, then great. I think it is the latter.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Coolbaugh did that, then great. Hard to see how he could have been successful even in the KBO with that kind of major swing deficit. If he had it in Korea, then our scouting was poor. If he just got into a temporary bad habit coming over here that he has corrected, then great. I think it is the latter.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

If he had it in Korea he wouldn't have had the success he did.

Me, I think maybe they are exaggerating what actually occurred.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Coolbaugh did that, then great. Hard to see how he could have been successful even in the KBO with that kind of major swing deficit. If he had it in Korea, then our scouting was poor. If he just got into a temporary bad habit coming over here that he has corrected, then great. I think it is the latter.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

He didn't have it in Korea. They said it was a mechanical flaw that got fixed. It happens a lot. I'm sure he was trying to impress in ST and he might have just gotten himself out of whack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...