Jump to content

Dan Duquette: Os to Be Active in Trade Market


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 407
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think selling high on Trumbo makes a lot of sense. Depends what you can get though.

I'll agree with trading Trumbo if we are more that 5 games out of a play-off spot, with several teams to jump, at the end of July.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DD screwed us bad on the SP front. Terrible. Everything he touches falls to crap in the starting pitching front.

How do we right the ship?

We probably have to trade one of Schoop or Trumbo.

Would you do it? Who would you target?

Do you trust DD to execute?

We ALL love Trumbo and Schoop. But Trumbo always tends to tail off and can he really stay this hot?

I much rather keep Schoop, but we need pitching and I am open to anything because right now, the Blue Jays will win the division IMO. Best pitching in the AL East right now and they will probably be big movers at the deadline.

Yes I trust DD. What team that has starting pitching will trade it? Neither player is

going to get you a front line starter. IMO. You are right that we need pitching. I

just think they have to go with who they have and hope it works out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're serious about winning this year, what sense does it make to trade two of your everyday regulars? The goal is this year, logic dictates you hang on to them and ride them to the end. I'm all for trading Trumbo if things trend in the wrong direction, but if the team keeps winning, and he's still producing, you ride that way all the way and either take a comp pick, or see if he'll sign a reasonable extension.

Just the same as the asinine idea of trading Givens, there's no reason to trade Schoop if you have years of control left, which you do, and if you have reason to believe he can get better, which people do. He's someone you keep to build around, unless you're blowing the whole thing up. You're not trading from strength by trading Schoop now, you're making an idiotic move that makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Britton is a key cog and reason for team to be where they are at.

I understand and agree with that. But who is going to give up a starter for a few months of Trumbo? We could have Givens, Brach, ODay, and possibly Wright at the back end of the bullpen. That weakens us less than losing Schoop (who we have for several more years).

If Britton could net us Joe Ross, I'd consider it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand and agree with that. But who is going to give up a starter for a few months of Trumbo? We could have Givens, Brach, ODay, and possibly Wright at the back end of the bullpen. That weakens us less than losing Schoop (who we have for several more years).

If Britton could net us Joe Ross, I'd consider it.

I doubt the Nats would take Trumbo for the trade.

as good as ODay and Brach are, neither are proven in the closer role, and Britton is so dominant, I hate to trade him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Britton could net us Joe Ross, I'd consider it.

Isn't Papelbon contractually and ego-bound to the closer position? Would the Nats really be better off trading away a good, young, cheap pitcher for a guy who'll have to pitch the 7th or 8th and will be making over $10M next year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, I don't trust him. I have said I would keep him through the end of the year and promote Brady.

And what proof do you have that Brady would be any good as GM? Because he keeps in great shape?

You are very tiresome. How many times do we have to hear you blasting DD? We get it you don't think he is doing a good job. I don't think there is anyone who doesn't know your opinion. Even if I thought DD was doing a terrible job I wouldn't want to read about it several times a day. And if DD is such a bad guy at trading why would you trust him to trade Schoop.

Perhaps trading Trey Mancini and some other minor league player could get us a mediocre starter. That would be good enough to help us win the division

Who do you plan to play second base if Schoop is traded? Trumbo only netted a third string catcher when he had a whole year of team control left. What do you think he will net with about a half a year left?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...