Jump to content

CBSBaltimore: Five Straight Years of Competition


weams

Recommended Posts

http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2017/02/15/mark-viviano-optimism-high-in-sarasota-for-os-spring-training/

Quote

“Spring training means it’s a rebirth,” says Allen File, of Richmond. “It’s a start over, forget last year, let’s start this year, gets your hopes going on for this year and think ‘Well, maybe this will be our year.'”

...

The Orioles have come a long way from their days as a perennial losing team. For five straight years, they’ve been contenders. And in three of those seasons, they’ve made the playoffs.

That’s a point of pride for players who have been part of the rebirth of the birds.

“Since I’ve been here in 2012, it’s kind of turned around a little bit,” says pitcher Darren O’Day. “We’ve put pretty good quality teams on the field every year. Hopefully something the fans enjoy watching.”

“We made the moves to put ourselves in a good position to be playing in October,” says Chris Tillman. “And I think that’s a great thing to be a part of.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, weams said:

Yeah all good, now let's win in October! Tillman should be getting his shoulder ready to go instead of providing his thoughts on a new season. I'm very optimistic about him this year. History shows that many guys whose arms bother them in the off-season improve greatly during the season with a heavy workload. As soon as I think of them I will list them :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there's the old saying... "all good things..." and I keep telling myself will this be it, and then I try and think about what went wrong last season, and whether or not any of those things got fixed.

How will this season be any different than the past 5? I don't see much to give me reason to believe that anything will.

tease me tease me, never please me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, big_sparxx said:

there's the old saying... "all good things..." and I keep telling myself will this be it, and then I try and think about what went wrong last season, and whether or not any of those things got fixed.

How will this season be any different than the past 5? I don't see much to give me reason to believe that anything will.

tease me tease me, never please me.

My wife said this morning when watching the MLB Network Ad, "All the teams other than the Cubs in that are sad."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, big_sparxx said:

there's the old saying... "all good things..." and I keep telling myself will this be it, and then I try and think about what went wrong last season, and whether or not any of those things got fixed.

How will this season be any different than the past 5? I don't see much to give me reason to believe that anything will.

tease me tease me, never please me.

So, you're complaining about the last five years, in which we won more games than any other AL team?   Uh, OK.

Look, I'm hoping we can make a World Series run, but if we end up making a wild card spot and then losing, that's hardly the worst thing in the world.     I found last season pretty damned exciting, despite the sudden death ending.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, big_sparxx said:

 

there's the old saying... "all good things..." and I keep telling myself will this be it, and then I try and think about what went wrong last season, and whether or not any of those things got fixed.

How will this season be any different than the past 5? I don't see much to give me reason to believe that anything will.

Tease me, tease me, never please me.

 

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

 

So, you're complaining about the last five years, in which we won more games than any other AL team? Uh, OK.

Look, I'm hoping we can make a World Series run, but if we end up making a wild card spot and then losing, that's hardly the worst thing in the world. I found last season pretty damned exciting, despite the sudden death ending.  

o

 

I think that a far more apt example of "Tease me, tease me, never please me" was the 2005 season. 

After 7 consecutive losing seasons (1998-2004), the Orioles were in 1st place up until late June. 

As the season progressed, my expectations gradually (and rapidly)  went down. After being excited at the prospect of possibly winning the division for almost half of the season, the Orioles lost 10 out of their next 13 games, and I downgraded my expectations to a possible Wildcard berth by early July. Less than 2 weeks after that (late July), the Orioles were barely above .500, and I was hoping that we would at least get a winning season out of it. Just a few days later, the Orioles were below .500. In a mere month, they went from 1st place in the toughest division in baseball to below .500, and looking like their usual losing selves again. After evening their record at 60-60 in mid-August, it was all downhill ........  14-28 over the final 42 games of the season, and a 74-88 overall record.

 

http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/BAL/2005-schedule-scores.shtml

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, OFFNY said:

 

o

 

I think that a far more apt example of "Tease me, tease me, never please me" was the 2005 season. 

After 7 consecutive losing seasons (1998-2004), the Orioles were in 1st place up until late June. 

As the season progressed, my expectations gradually (and rapidly)  went down. After being excited at the prospect of possibly winning the division for almost half of the season, the Orioles lost 10 out of their next 13 games, and I downgraded my expectations to a possible Wildcard berth by early July. Less than 2 weeks after that (late July), the Orioles were barely above .500, and I was hoping that we would at least get a winning season out of it. Just a few days later, the Orioles were below .500. In a mere month, they went from 1st place in the toughest division in baseball to below .500, and looking like their usual losing selves again. After evening their record at 60-60 in mid-August, it was all downhill ........  14-28 over the final 42 games of the season, and a 74-88 overall record.

 

http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/BAL/2005-schedule-scores.shtml

 

 

 

 

And, Raffygate and all of its aftermath.   There's a reason attendance dropped by 470,000 in 2006, the biggest one-year drop in  OPACY history (excluding the strike-shortened seasons).   2005 was a crushing disappointment after how it started, and a lot of fans got fed up and never came back.    We've never reached the 2005 attendance figure again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, big_sparxx said:

there's the old saying... "all good things..." and I keep telling myself will this be it, and then I try and think about what went wrong last season, and whether or not any of those things got fixed.

How will this season be any different than the past 5? I don't see much to give me reason to believe that anything will.

tease me tease me, never please me.

Getting to the playoffs does not mean any team will make it to the World Series, but not getting to the playoffs sure as heck means not getting to the World Series.  I remember when they had the first playoffs in MLB history in 1969 and again in 1970 and the Orioles faced the Minnesota Twins both times.    The Orioles, of course, won both 3-0 series, but I was never as on edge ever as I was during each one of those games, because you just knew how easy it would be in a short series to lose.  And those Orioles teams were one of the best teams of all time.   

Getting in the dance is the 162 game objective.  After that, it is simply who happens to be playing the best those last weeks.   Any year the Orioles are in the playoffs is, to me, a cause of celebration.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tntoriole said:

 

Getting to the playoffs does not mean any team will make it to the World Series, but not getting to the playoffs sure as heck means not getting to the World Series. I remember when they had the first playoffs in MLB history in 1969 and again in 1970 and the Orioles faced the Minnesota Twins both times. The Orioles, of course, won both 3-0 series, but I was never as on edge ever as I was during each one of those games, because you just knew how easy it would be in a short series to lose.  And those Orioles teams were one of the best teams of all time.   

Getting in the dance is the 162 game objective.  After that, it is simply who happens to be playing the best those last weeks. Any year the Orioles are in the playoffs is, to me, a cause of celebration.  

o

 

And they followed that up with a 3-game sweep of the Oakland Athletics in 1971.

3 straight League Championship Series, 3 straight sweeps, and a 9-0 record in said series. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, MDtransplant757 said:

I'm happy for the past 5 years, because 14 years of misery will do that to you. I think we'll win it sometime in the next 5 years 

As long as the team wins games all year, I really care little about the last one. I'm not marching in a parade anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, tntoriole said:

Getting to the playoffs does not mean any team will make it to the World Series, but not getting to the playoffs sure as heck means not getting to the World Series.  I remember when they had the first playoffs in MLB history in 1969 and again in 1970 and the Orioles faced the Minnesota Twins both times.    The Orioles, of course, won both 3-0 series, but I was never as on edge ever as I was during each one of those games, because you just knew how easy it would be in a short series to lose.  And those Orioles teams were one of the best teams of all time.   

Getting in the dance is the 162 game objective.  After that, it is simply who happens to be playing the best those last weeks.   Any year the Orioles are in the playoffs is, to me, a cause of celebration.  

Amen. Get in. And give the wheel a spin. Luck, be a lady tonight. Even if you are the mighty Cubs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...