Jump to content

Roy Sievers Died


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

o

 

Roy Sievers, who was was traded by the Baltimore Orioles to the original Washington Senators (now the Minnesota Twins) just prior to the 1954 season, has died.

Sievers was the American League Rookie of the Year for the St. Louis Browns in 1949, hitting 16 Home Runs with 91 RBI's, while batting .306 with a .398 OBP.

Injuries curtailed Sievers over the next 4 seasons (1950-1953) with the Browns, limiting him to playing only 247 games over said span.

With the original Senators, Sievers'  career thrived. He had 100 or more RBI's in 4 out of the next 5 seasons, and gathered  95 RBI's in the other. He led the American League in Home Runs (42) and RBI's (114) in 1957.

Although injuries limited him to playing only 115 Games in 1959, he still managed to hit 21 Home Runs for the Senators in his final season with the team before being traded to the White Sox.

Sievers' career was once again revived over the next 4 seasons (1960-1963) with the White Sox and the Phillies, as he hit 95 Home Runs and had 347 RBI's for said teams in those seasons.

Sievers wound up his career in 1964 and 1965, playing sparingly in said seasons for the Phillies and the expansion Senators, who would later move to Arlington, Texas to become the Rangers.

For his career overall, Sievers hit 318 Home Runs to go along with 1,147 RBI's, 292 Doubles, 1,703 Hits, and batted .267 with a .354 OBP. He also made 4 All-Star teams in 6 seasons between 1956 and 1961.

 

Sievers was 90 years-old.

 

 

Five-Time All-Star Roy Sievers Dead at 90

(By Ron Clements)

http://www.sportingnews.com/mlb/news/roy-sievers-obituary-st-louis-browns-rookie-of-the-year-all-star/1h4lbwj39iyfm1wm5hyvvfbif4

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...