Jump to content

Mini Camp Thread


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I didn’t interpret their comments as meaning that they just learned of Britton’s injury at minicamp.    I interpreted them as saying that they were crushed when they heard the news (whenever that was).

Good point, I hadnt thought about that, and I am sure you are right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, weams said:

 

 

5 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Thats encouraging, maybe they can sign him to a cheap, but heavy incentive deal.

I’m not sure if I find that encouraging or not.   I’m not sure signing Tillman is a plus.    But I’d be OK with him competing for the fifth slot.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

 

I’m not sure if I find that encouraging or not.   I’m not sure signing Tillman is a plus.    But I’d be OK with him competing for the fifth slot.   

I am not ready to get off the Tilly bandwagon, base on his poor season last.

I am not blindly believing he is going to be a 20-5 winner with Cy Young.

Curious to see how he pitches in the ST and see if he is able to bounce back.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I would image he is, since he is not under contract.

I suspect there are legal papers, he has to sign, in order to work out with them as a non-contract invitee.

Thanks for your imaginings and suspicions.

Now, does anyone actually know the answer to the question of who is responsible if he gets hurt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Thanks for your imaginings and suspicions.

Now, does anyone actually know the answer to the question of who is responsible if he gets hurt?

I think I might have been wrong:

Quote

The veteran player is usually signed to a "two-way" salary option—one for their time in the minors and another if they are placed on the 40-man during the season. All spring training invitees are under some sort of contract, to avoid liability if an injury were to occur to the player.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I think I might have been wrong:

 

Thanks for digging that up. I'm not sure it pertains to the mini-camp, but maybe Roch or another writer on the O's beat will read this, find out for us and tweet the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Thanks for digging that up. I'm not sure it pertains to the mini-camp, but maybe Roch or another writer on the O's beat will read this, find out for us and tweet the answer.

I was reading through some old tweets from some beat reporters about a few things and ran across a couple gross inaccuracies. I'd wait to hear it from Buck, Brady or Dan before I would believe how that works. I know the gym here has an indemnification form. I'd go along with Rick and assume the Orioles do as well. But hey. No one knows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • We played all our Saturday games at home at 4pm. That should help us.  I don’t know if that was the full reason we made the switch this year, but it had to factor in. We didn’t do so well in the day games last year in the playoffs.  Also, don’t be surprised to see McCann get a big hit in game 1 and possibly just start this entire series versus the speedster Royals.  Let’s go. We owe these “guys” big time paybacks even if it’s 10 years later. 
    • They also smacked him around for 7 ER on 9 H in 1.2 innings. He can be beaten, though he certainly had a great September.  
    • I understand why posters would want to avoid Skubal in a game 1, but the Royals starters are not going to be a cakewalk. Probably a deeper starting staff with Ragans, Lugo and Wacha.
    • Interesting article …. Pretty surprising stat with all the guys that we lost to injury       https://www.masnsports.com/blog/orioles-made-it-through-rough-t
    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...