Jump to content

Sept 17 -- Suarez vs Cy Snell.


ShoelesJoe

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, EddeeEddee said:

Did you think that at the time it happened or just this season?

Well it's funny in 2018 I remember hearing these great things about Will and wanted him after seeing the Orioles would get that following  June first pick then the season started and Adley had the better year so yeah I wanted Adley at that point. The saying I should had stuck to my original thinking 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Baseball fandom said:

Well it's funny in 2018 I remember hearing these great things about Will and wanted him after seeing the Orioles would get that following  June first pick then the season started and Adley had the better year so yeah I wanted Adley at that point. The saying I should had stuck to my original thinking 

Adley had the better rookie season.  Things can change quickly in baseball, and I'm optimistic Adley can turn things around.  But I highly doubt he'll turn things around before the end of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, oriolediehard said:

The O's had 2 1st round picks they chose catchers: Western and Adley, they were just mediocre. Catchers are a tough position.

Not too many I-Rods or Piazzas out there, that’s for sure. But I wouldn’t call A-Rutsch a bust by any means. Let’s see what 2025 brings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RavensNOsGuy said:

I am a small gambler here and there but that seems like a steal. I guess Vegas hasn’t caught up yet that we have quit on the season.

I loaded up on sf ml and sf -1.5 and parlay sf ml, sf -2.5, snell 7 ks, Os under 3.5 runs. Hit everything.

that made wasting my evening feel a little better. Left after the 7th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yossarian said:

I liked how Adley had the vshin guards on in the dugout in the bottom of the ninth - thinking they may have had a chance to get to extras.

Makes no sense because even if we DID score 10 in the 9th to miraculously force extra innings, Adley would have to bat again before that happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oriolediehard said:

The O's had 2 1st round picks they chose catchers: Western and Adley, they were just mediocre. Catchers are a tough position.

Adley was excellent for 2+ years and has been bad for less than 3 months.   Let's not go overboard and declare him a failure.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • McDermott pitched 3 IP last night. Coloumbe 0.2 IP. https://www.milb.com/gameday/sounds-vs-tides/2024/09/18/752645/final/box Big news. 
    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...