I like how you credit Elias and Company for developing Grayson but forget that Hall showed little progress under their development.
I don't see how you can look at what they have accomplished with hitters and think, hey, let's also try and give them credit for a pitcher that Dan's team selected.
Is what they've accomplished with hitters not enough to warrant a thread praising them?
The post would be a lot stronger without trying to shoehorn in the pitcher.