Jump to content

The Dylan Bundy Analysis


Recommended Posts

Getting back to the signing bonus for Bundy, I will offer the following markers from the BA Prospect Handbook:

- top HS pitcher bonuses - 2010 Taillon - $6.5M second overall; 2009 - Jacob Turner - $4.7M (major league deal worth $5.5M total); Porcello - $7M major league deal ($3.6M signing bonus)

- number four picks overall - 2010 - Colon - $2.75M; 2009 - Sanchez - $2.5M; 2008 - Matusz - $3.2M

- other notable bonuses - Harper - $6.25M as part of $9.9M ML contract; 2009 - Strausburg - $7.5M; Ackley - $6.0M; Tate - $6.25M; 2008 - Beckham - $6.15M; Alaverez - $6.0M; Hosmer - $6.0M; Posey $6.2M; 2011 Bauer - $3.4M as part of possible $7M ML deal

- large Orioles bonuses - Machado - $5.25M; Wieters - $6.0M

Bundy is supposed to be a polished pitcher with a tremendous fastball and a quality secondaries. He would be expected to move rapidly through our system.

At first glance, IMO, it is easy to see the $6.0M-$6.5M range of Wieters, Harper, Ackley, Tate, Beckham and Alvarez and try to put Bundy in that range.

I think the best comparisons for Bundy on a straight signing bonuses are last year's top three picks - Harper (the special bat), Taillon (highly rated HS pitcher) and Machado (another top bat at a premium position). These three averaged $6.0M and were all taken higher than Bundy.

There is also this from an Ask BA from Jim Callis:

Taillon was the No. 2 pick in last year's draft, and the Pirates say they would have taken him over Bryce Harper if they had owned the first choice. There's not much to separate them, but I'd rate Bundy ahead of Taillon, with Bradley behind them both. Taillon had a fastball/curveball combo similar to Bradley's, but Bundy's third and fourth pitches are better and he also has more polish, which makes him more big league-ready. Taillon had a more classic pitcher's body at 6-foot-6 and 225 pounds, but Bundy makes up for his lack of size (6-foot-1, 205 pounds) with his strength and by creating a deceptive angle to the plate.

I asked a veteran scouting director this question, and he texted back about Bundy: "Best HS arm/pitcher I've ever seen!!!" He may not go higher than Taillon did, but that says more about the abundance of college pitching talent in the 2011 draft than of any shortcoming on Bundy's part.

IMO, this puts us back at Taillon's $6.5M and begs the question - how much more would Bundy deserve? Tough question.

I can see the negotiations right now:

Bundy - We want $1M more than Taillon - $7.5M.

AM - Taillon went two slots higher and we paid Machado $5.25M and he's killing it in High A-ball right now. I'm offering $5.5M.

Bundy - That's not even in the ballpark, Andy. There is no way we are signing for $1M less than Taillon.

AM - I've heard that first part before and there is no way I'm giving out $2M more than Machado.

Bundy - We'll give a little here, but the first number must be a 7, Andy. We are rated higher than Taillon. $7.25M.

AM - I may have to give out a franchise record here - so I'll go to $6.25M.

Where does it go from here?

Is AM going to give out the highest signing bonus ever to a HS pitcher?

Will Bundy sign for less than Taillon - who was taken higher in the draft?

We do have a GM that "held" Wieters to $6.0M and Machado to $5.25M.

I could see a bonus as low as $5.75M and one as high as $7.5M. IMO, that is the range from where the negotiators make the big bucks.

I do think this is going to be a franchise record, but I do not believe the first number will be a 7. I am eager to see which side of $6.5M this lands as I am sure Bundy wants more than Harper and AM does not want to set a new record for HS pitchers - especially by $1M.

I will estimate $6.6M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Said pre-draft, will say now: $6.5-7.5 million, depending on structure.

I don't personally think any of the prior bonuses to position players or college pitchers are relevant at all. He'll be compared to HS arms, and the Bundys would be smart to push ML deal and point to Porcello.

Past signings for 1:4 is wholly irrelevant, particularly since two of the three mentioned above were roundly accepted as overdrafts to lock in slot signings.

Rankings of players will not be taken into account on the player side (though Baltimore will obviously use their own internal valuations which serve as "rankings").

Harper/Machado irrelevant -- bonuses aren't generally comped to slot, but rather cross-section from which the player is pulled (HS/college; pitcher/position player; one sport/two sport).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The Dylan Bundy Analysis sounds like the next Dan Brown book.

Really hoping we get both Bundy and Delmonico signed. Sort of indifferent about Esposito. I'm still totally caught up in the whole "slider bat speed" thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Jordan is very good at the negotiation part of his job. He has lost very few top targets over the years, and his BA on overslot targets is pretty good, too. $6.225 mm for Bundy is a very good deal.

I had nice conversation with Joe last night and got some good insights on the negotiations. Without a doubt Joe does his home work and he and his scouts do a pretty good job of knowing the guys they draft. Very rarely do they get the wrong message. Joe knew without a doubt that Bundy was going pro. He tried to get him out of the major league deal but that became the main issue and he decided it was not a deal breaker. They offered him more bonus money to drop the ML deal but he wanted the major league deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...