Jump to content

Kevin Gregg dominating again


Rex Thunder

Recommended Posts

Has anyone noticed? Inserted as the new Mets closer, and hasn't given up a run yet in 7.1 innings, to go along with 8 strikeouts. ONly given up 3 hits and 3 walks... while racking up 5 saves in 5 chances.

Go figure...

I believe he's pitching with the Cubs, but more importantly...

Again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe he's pitching with the Cubs, but more importantly...

Again?

Ooops, meant the Cubs. Was watching Mets highlights while writing.

Maybe dominating was a tiny stretch- but YES, again. The year before we picked him up he had a 3.51 ERA and had 37 saves. He certainly was an above average reliever at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Relievers are just crazy to predict. I think that was one of the reasons why the Orioles kept him around for so long last year. Gregg's stuff was always pretty good, but he struggled to command it. Perhaps he's on a streak of commanding it for awhile, but I saw enough of him over the last few years to say I wouldn't want to have to trust him late in games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got to say I'm happy for Kevin. He handled his situation here in the hightest professional manner. He didn't whine or #$%^ he took it in stride and even mentored a lot of the younger guys.

Glad he is having success!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say Gregg was never dominating. He was probably average to above average at various points, but basically not very good. Some not so bright GM's fell in love with save totals one of them paid way too much for him. Unfortunately, he was ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got to say I'm happy for Kevin. He handled his situation here in the hightest professional manner. He didn't whine or #$%^ he took it in stride and even mentored a lot of the younger guys.

Glad he is having success!

I think that's going a bit far.

In September of 2011, Gregg informed us all that we obviously haven't acquired a tasted in his pitching yet.

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/blog/2011/09/gregg_you_obviously_havent_acq.html

By the time that he was demoted to mop-up duty after the Red Sox fiasco/game in May of 2012, it's not like he had much of an argument to continue claiming that we didn't understand/accept his taste in pitching. So yes, at that point he finally understood what was happening, and just pitched without complaining any more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Nobody put words in your mouth.  I asked you questions.  That you can't answer them should suggest to you how thought out our positions are. 1) The goal is the World Series.  What makes you think it isn't? 2)  That's the most generic statement possible that is impossible to analyze, 3) So Elfin, Burnes, Bradish, Cano, etc.  don't count because you don't want them to count.  But other than that, he's got a bad track record of trading..... .like what trade?  Are we all supposed to go insane and only evaluate one trade- the Rodgers trade- in the most hyperbolic terms necessary to justify our hyperbole? 4) So we judge him for hypothetical trades that we didn't make and can't even be analyzed?  LOL. Flaherty was a worthless trade?  This is the same Flaherty that started Game 1 of the World Series this year, right? Oh, so you just want to cry about Rodgers ad nauseum?  Cry ahead. So you want to fire the most successful GM we've had since Pat Gillick but you haven't even thought about who'd you replace him with?  And wouldn't even bothered until he was fired?  You understand how stupid that is, right?
    • I think he’s all in. That’s why I have hope that he will resign Burnes and add some veteran offensive a talent to help the team play better in October 
    • This is as plausible a theory as any other that has been trotted out since the end of the regular season and it's one I fully subscribe to. Personally however, I think restraint is advisable when it comes to comparing his historical business leadership to his newfound role as 75 year-old billionaire owner of a a sports franchise.  Especially given his demonstrated propensity for dancing on the home team dugout during the seventh inning stretch.
    • Noted … I’d much rather have Teoscar. They would need to determine if Profar is the 2024 player or prior. 
    • Stop putting words in my mouth!    1) The goal needs to be the World Series 2) We need to spend wisely …but we need to spend 3) Oh Stop ….i gave him credit for Eflin and Burnes. The others were during the rebuild and selling trades. Which I said in my response to you,  4) It’s not one trade …. He’s tried to get help2 deadlines now. Beyond Eflin at two deadlines he’s done little to help the team reach the ultimate goal.    His moves in 2023 were Jack Flaherty who was basically worthless and Fuji who was so inconsistent that he’s not even pitching in the majors. Did I forget anyone? He did little to help an offense that was struggling mightily in 2024. He gave a lot away this deadline. They got Eflin but most everything else was mediocre or worse. The Rogers deal was just horrible. And why was he shopping in the bargain bin pile. Rogers was a 4.5 ERA starter before the trade which really wasn’t an upgrade and he crapped the bed after he got here.    I’m undecided over who I’d go after to replace Elias when the times comes.
    • In the estimation of bitter donkeys whose primary purpose for posting is to complain and criticize: infinite.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...