-
Who's Online 10 Members, 2 Anonymous, 305 Guests (See full list)
-
Posts
-
By Allan Bryant · Posted
This trade IMO is addition by subtraction . Hays is no longer starting RHB OF with us . Hays has done great job with us when we were rebuilding. The other good part of this trade is RHP for bullpen, which needs all the help they can get . The OF Pache is a defensive wizard who has no bat . I look for him to be DFA after the deadline concludes . -
I would have rather kept Etzel and packaged Bradfield to see what we could have gotten. I think Etzel was the CF of the future for the O's. I don't think Bradfield will ever make the bigs for Baltimore. -
B for Orioles, A for Rays. The Orioles gave up too much for a pitcher with a plus 4.00 ERA. The Hays trade was awful; a decent outfielder for two bums. On the subject of trades, if the O's surrender Holliday, Kjerstad, or Mayo for anyone, they are out of their minds. Trade Basallo and/or Bradfield instead. Of the MLB roster, get rid of Mullins, Urias, Mateo, Pache, and Perez, if anyone takes them. -
.thumb.jpg.3c326c466df346ce3aa2d706d911f3cd.jpg)
I said love it because I can't judge a trade on what was done or not done otherwise. This is a great trade. We gave up nothing of real significance and got a legit starter for a year and 1/2. -
-
Unless we are willing to part with Holliday for Skubal.... with Miller down for a while and Crochet tanking his own trade value with the whole I won't pitch in the postseason without an extension.... it doesn't feel like there are a lot of great options here. -
By Allan Bryant · Posted
That would make sense . Let’s clear up the logjam and see where we are after deadline smoke fade away. Plus there is service time clock to sort out
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
.thumb.jpg.3c326c466df346ce3aa2d706d911f3cd.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.