Jump to content

Does this make sense based on what you've seen this year?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

If a stat isn't judging a player properly it shouldn't matter if its over 1 game or 20 the merits of that stat become suspect. Seems worth discussing to me.

(that being said a fly ball to right field just landed 5 inches out of Markakis' reach. I bet a better RF would have caught that)

Chris Davis hits a long fly ball that is killed by the wind -- usually a home run but is caught. Next at bat line drive out to first base. Next at bat umpire misses a called strike three on Davis, who eventually walks. Next at bat he singles off the end of the bat after being fooled badly on an off-speed pitch down and away.

Which of these stats is accurately judging Davis?

AVG - .333

OBP - .500

SLG - .333

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Chris Davis hits a long fly ball that is killed by the wind -- usually a home run but is caught. Next at bat line drive out to first base. Next at bat umpire misses a called strike three on Davis, who eventually walks. Next at bat he singles off the end of the bat after being fooled badly on an off-speed pitch down and away.

Which of these stats is accurately judging Davis?

AVG - .333

OBP - .500

SLG - .333

For that game, all three!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For that game, all three!

I don't think so. That's only true if you believe the quality of the player's performance will continue to yield the same results. What makes those stats worthy of note is that we know there is a point at which they normalize and GENERALLY the noise caused by the bloops and the line outs and the missed calls and the whatnots become secondary to the skill set that is driving those numbers.

If Davis were to end each game with two incredibly hard struck balls and two at bats where he was out maneuvered by the pitcher, do you think it's reasonable to expect his season triple-slash to be .333/.500/.333?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think so. That's only true if you believe the quality of the player's performance will continue to yield the same results. What makes those stats worthy of note is that we know there is a point at which they normalize and GENERALLY the noise caused by the bloops and the line outs and the missed calls and the whatnots become secondary to the skill set that is driving those numbers.

If Davis were to end each game with two incredibly hard struck balls and two at bats where he was out maneuvered by the pitcher, do you think it's reasonable to expect his season triple-slash to be .333/.500/.333?

His stats are based on what he did that game. You add them to the next game and all future games and you get the full picture. But for that one game, those are his stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His stats are based on what he did that game. You add them to the next game and all future games and you get the full picture. But for that one game, those are his stats.

That's the deal with UZR too. But one play, where Markakis happened to be shading over to center field, could lead him to not getting to a catchable ball. Over the course of a couple seasons of data that noise becomes background (e.g. Nick will get credit for catching a "tough ball" while he is shaded to center), but its impact is magnified over a 12 game sample.

UZR over 12 games is NOT indicative of the player's ability over those 12 games just like a single game's worth of data is almost never indicative of the actual skill level of that player. There's too much noise in the numbers at that level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the deal with UZR too. But one play, where Markakis happened to be shading over to center field, could lead him to not getting to a catchable ball. Over the course of a couple seasons of data that noise becomes background (e.g. Nick will get credit for catching a "tough ball" while he is shaded to center), but its impact is magnified over a 12 game sample.

UZR over 12 games is NOT indicative of the player's ability over those 12 games just like a single game's worth of data is almost never indicative of the actual skill level of that player. There's too much noise in the numbers at that level.

Not counting tonight's game. Nick was batting 14-52 for a .269 average. His average is based on his hits divided by his at bats. If that continues at that rate his batting average after 150 games is projected to be, .269

Now can you or anyone else explain UZR and what he has done to warrant a negative number and how they project that number over 150 games to be -8.9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not counting tonight's game. Nick was batting 14-52 for a .269 average. His average is based on his hits divided by his at bats. If that continues at that rate his batting average after 150 games is projected to be, .269

Now can you or anyone else explain UZR and what he has done to warrant a negative number and how they project that number over 150 games to be -8.9

Why bother, you aren't listening?

I will try, again.

Nick didn't get to one or more balls your average right fielder gets to. Since such a large percentage of those balls are caught, it is a major demerit when he failed to make the play.

Now lets say he makes a bad throw to third and a runner advances, the defensive metrics also take that into account.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why bother, you aren't listening?

I will try, again.

Nick didn't get to one or more balls your average right fielder gets to. Since such a large percentage of those balls are caught, it is a major demerit when he failed to make the play.

Now lets say he makes a bad throw to third and a runner advances, the defensive metrics also take that into account.

What's the formula? How do they know he should have had it or someone else would have? Who makes the determinations?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did I say that? Where did I say that?

I said ask the folks that designed it, since they are, you know, the experts on it.

Also mystical /=/ math.

So it's a mystical formula only the people who designed and track it know?

Where did I say you said that? I asked you a question.

IF the only people who know how it's derived are the people who made it and track it. How do you or anyone else know it's accurate? Do you just take everything they say as fact?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did I say you said that? I asked you a question.

IF the only people who know how it's derived are the people who made it and track it. How do you or anyone else know it's accurate? Do you just take everything they say as fact?

Where did I say that?

You sure think I say a lot of things I don't say.

I am not a math guy. The minutia of the mathematical formula they use is of no interest to me.

I also don't know all the math needed to make a 747 fly, it doesn't stop me from getting on a plane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And how do we know they designed it right?

Sounds like player position based around coaching decisions and team scouting (things the player has no control over) can have a meaningful effect on whether or not a fielder is deemed good or bad.

That ground ball that Wieters hit to 3B. Routine play! Oop except the coaching staff made the 3B shift over to SS. Boy 3B you really sucked on that one. Negative points for you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And how do we know they designed it right?

Sounds like player position based around coaching decisions and team scouting (things the player has no control over) can have a meaningful effect on whether or not a fielder is deemed good or bad.

That ground ball that Wieters hit to 3B. Routine play! Oop except the coaching staff made the 3B shift over to SS. Boy 3B you really sucked on that one. Negative points for you!

Except for the fact that they factor in shifts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Most quality major league starter's hold their velocity throughout their starts. They may cruise for a bit, but have it when they want it. Typically command goes long before velocity.
    • Do we not want to throw a left hander and take advantage of the spacious left field?
    • Thank goodness a minor league system is not judged on wins and losses, because they are putting many Ws up of late. Delmarva is pretty much an embarrassment right now from the hitting side. The first real wave of international position prospects have been left wanting after the first month or so of the season. The Shorebirds are scoring a league low 2.29 runs per game and slashing a league worse .182/.259/.263/.523. The Tides pitching outside of Povich and McDermott to a lesser extent has been pretty bad minus a few decent relieves in Vespi, Krook and Charles.  Elias/Sig's thought on being able to identify pitching talent through pitch shapes and spin rates through the draft after the 10th round has been a pretty big failure. Armbruster was the flag ship pitcher and he's been a flop this year so far, though I had already seen major red flags from him last year. Not surprisingly these guys struggle at the high levels and why they were available that late. Glad to see Elias made a change in his draft philosophy last year and went after some younger, higher ceiling guys like Forret vs 21-year old juniors in those later rounds.   
    • Akin currently has a FIP of 1.11. He’s struck out 15 and walked 3 in 10 innings without yielding a homer.  I consider that well.
    • There are several advantages to a head first slide.    With a head first slide, the mass of your body (torso) is lunging forward, not pulling backward - you get to the bag quicker. When you tuck a leg to slide, your foot tends to raise up and not hit the front of the bag, whereas, with your hand you can hit the front of the bag and maintain contact with it. You can adjust the direction of your slide going head first and even switch which arm you extend to touch the bag (swim move) to avoid a tag.  Both can have their place.  I was taught to slide with the right leg tucked going into second base.  That way, your face/chest/crotch are not exposed to the throw from the catcher if the fielder misses the throw, and you're facing the outfield and can find the ball easier if there is an errant throw so you can decide quicker if you can take another base. 
    • Briefly, here is the method I use with a DirecTV DVR for all sorts of timing in football analysis: 1. From a recording on your DVR, hit pause at some point shortly before the ball is released by the pitcher 2. While still on pause, use the FF button to advance the video 1 "frame" at a time.  On 1080i, the screen is redrawn 30 times per second, so each click is 1/30th of a second.  On 720p or 1080p, it's 60 frames per second.  So timing should be accurate to either 1/30th (0.033) or 1/60th (0.017) of a second 3. Advance the video to the point of contact--It is easy to go forward, but difficult to go backward, so you need to advance slowly to fin the closest point 4. From that point, count the number of FF clicks until Gunnar hits 3rd base, you should actually be able to see the image move with each click, so it's easier to count these than you might think 5. Divide clicks counted by 30 to get seconds for the event.  For example, if you get 322 clicks, it's 10 and 22/30 seconds (10.73 sec).  This assumes the MASN broadcast is in 1080i. I've been using this method for more than 15 years and you can confirm calibration with an NFL game where the clock is on the screen.  Since you don't have that in baseball, you just have to know whether it's 30 or 60 clicks per second and you'll know that by whether it's an 11 or 22-second triple.
    • Wait, Drungo isn't allowed to make jokes? I thought that post was hilarious given the context. I think better of him for it, though I've always thought highly of him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...