Jump to content

Replacing Nick's OBP


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Dan Duquette said in his interview on High Heat that the O's were going to have to work on replacing Nick's OBP before the opener. So how does he do that? Here is an idea.

After Dan signs Rasmus he will have two corner outfielder, neither of which hits lefties well. An De Aza, who is projected as the leadoff hitter at the moment, has a 329 OBP over the last three years. No high enough for an everyday leadoff hitter. His splits are 335 vs righties and 309 vs lefties over the last three years. But Buck is not going to want to platoon both Rasmus and De Aza. Its not the optimal situation.

Here's the idea---- What if they sign Aoki and trade DeAza. Aoki hits lefties and righties well enough that he does not have to be platooned. Aoki's three year averages are 287/353/387/740. That is a higher OBP than De Aza and a 10 point higher OPS.

Aoki three year splits are 371 OBP vs lefties and 346 OBP vs righties. That is good enough to replace Nick as a leadoff hitter and is good enough not to be platooned.

I don't know who plays right and who plays left between Rasmus and Aoki. That is something to figure out in ST. But what the O's will have in Aoki/Jones and the sharing of one position with Rasmus/Pearce. Pearce/Young shares DH.

The other good thing about this configuration is that Lough fits as the other OF. Because there is not two platoons in the outfield. A second righty like Hassan is not needed. Hassan goes to AAA.

So that is the idea to improve the OBP. What do you think? Or do you have a better idea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Seriously though I already did the work on why De Aza will be an average MLB lead off hitter in its own thread. I'm resigned to the team talks of OBP meaning that they want their existing players to improve in that department... and yes there is room for many of them to improve up-and-down the lineup. Especially Jonathan Schoop. We will not be a high OBP team any time in the near future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously though I already did the work on why De Aza will be an average MLB lead off hitter in its own thread. I'm resigned to the team talks of OBP meaning that they want their existing players to improve in that department... and yes there is room for many of them to improve up-and-down the lineup. Especially Jonathan Schoop. We will not be a high OBP team any time in the near future.

Please post the link here so we don't go down that rabbit hole all over again. I appreciated the work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Instead of signing Rasmus and trading De Aza to sign Aoki, a simpler solution would be to sign Aoki instead of Rasmus. If we were interested in Aoki, I have to think there would be no reason to sign Rasmus. I would rather have De Aza at 5m than Rasmus at 8m.

With De Aza as the primary leadoff hitter, I wouldn't mind seeing Pearce against LHP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously though I already did the work on why De Aza will be an average MLB lead off hitter in its own thread. I'm resigned to the team talks of OBP meaning that they want their existing players to improve in that department... and yes there is room for many of them to improve up-and-down the lineup. Especially Jonathan Schoop. We will not be a high OBP team any time in the near future.

Your analysis does not speak to the fact that De Aza has a 311 career OBP vs lefties which does not suggest a leadoff role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your analysis does not speak to the fact that De Aza has a 311 career OBP vs lefties which does not suggest a leadoff role.

Last year we faced a RH starter 121 times. If we have a .311 OBP out of the leadoff spot the other 41 games, I can live with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Not disagreeing with you it’s just a team that would likely trade for Urias would be “contending”.  Those types of teams just don’t trade away pitching. They don’t. So we’re looking at a prospect return, when right now we need MLB immediate help. 
    • Totally agree. The guy is a buffoon pure and simple. Might actually be WORSE than his father. I am starting to feel like this team will not be sold and we will be stuck w/ mediocrity for decades more to come. Prove me wrong John! Extend Adley and Gunnar and sign some bigger free agents next off season.
    • We desperately need Grayson to pitch his way into our rotation so that we can bump Wells to the pen. We might be better with Voth in the rotation over Wells right now because we need MR/SU help bad. 
    • I know that they played the same positions last year at Fenway, but I almost wonder if it would make more sense to just leave Hays in LF and Santander in RF (when he's in the OF) regardless of stadium. I get the logic of Hays covering more ground, but there is an adjustment to how the ball comes off the bat and I wonder if the overall defense throughout the course of the season would be improved if they consistently get the same looks, playing the same positions. Ultimately, it probably doesn't matter, but just me wondering. 
    • My issue isn’t the $8 million we gave Frazier. It’s the thought process of Elias. He trades away Jorge Looez last year because he was hitting the last two years of arb. That Lopez trade hurt us last year, and it’s going to hurt us this year. So Bautista took of vet Lopez as closer. However, who is taking over for Bautista for RH set up?  So was the Jorge Lopez trade worth it, considering we were so close to the WC last year, and should contend this year? Hindisight is 20/20, but it looks like we would’ve been better off keeping Lopez in MR/SU, filling out the IF with a combo of in house options, not signing Givens for $7 million, then spending the $15 million on another SP.    We could be stacked right now if we would’ve signed a pitcher and added $15 million in salary. With Lopez and Wells in MR/SU.    Elias hasn’t had good resource allocation. You don’t just trade away relievers that throw 99 mph sinkers. Not when your window is just opening. You also don’t sign FAs when the strength of your org is MI.    The real shame is going to be that we might have to turn to GR for MR, and give him the Gausman treatment. It’s going to get really frustrating watching the Lineup and SP give us leads with this bullpen. 
    • This was my first experience with watching the new rules in play and it will take me time to adjust. I was forced to watch on MLB extra innings..hence Sox announcers. The didn't care for the Devers call, but he was admiring the long foul ball he hit the previous pitch. They were complaining that the pitcher wasn't even on the rubber yet. I do like the shortened time between innings and for the most part the better pace of the game. I didn't care for lack of replays..like AR's first inning HR, not that the Sox announcers would have said much. I don't need to see replays over and over again, but one good time is plenty. What are they going to do when a player has a milestone game and fans want to give him an ovation?? Umpire's discretion?? Announcers will have to adjust too, they really don't have much time to complain about close pitches before the next pitch happens. I also enjoy not watching batters adjust their batting gloves after every pitch.
    • Part of me wants to make a Sons of Sam Horn account and just casually drop this there. But that site is ungodly to look at in format.  OH is so much easily to navigate and more aesthetically pleasing.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...