Jump to content

Does Chen get a QO? Does he accept?


Crazysilver03

Does Chen get a QO? Does he accept?  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. Does Chen get a QO? Does he accept?

    • Chen receives QO and accepts
    • Chen receives QO and declines
    • Chen doesn't receive QO


Recommended Posts

True. I thought about taking a look at the different teams that are losing said starters and trying to find out the most likely way they will replace them.

But a quick glimpse makes me think a lot will be replaced internally. Toronto. Cincinnati. Florida. Washington. Baltimore.

Is it possible that the O's organization will actually make a run at resigning Chen? Or is there someone within our ML system that could replace him? I realize that there are some disagreements on this board as to whether the Orioles are on a budget or whether Angelos simply doesn't want to pay. I do think that resigning Chen would be better than trying out another FA pitcher. Chen is a proven commodity with the O's whereas a less expensive FA outsider isn't going to necessarily work out for the O's.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Is it possible that the O's organization will actually make a run at resigning Chen? Or is there someone within our ML system that could replace him? I realize that there are some disagreements on this board as to whether the Orioles are on a budget or whether Angelos simply doesn't want to pay. I do think that resigning Chen would be better than trying out another FA pitcher. Chen is a proven commodity with the O's whereas a less expensive FA outsider isn't going to necessarily work out for the O's.

If Chen and Norris depart, Gausman can enter the rotation. Bundy is out of options and needs to make the 25 man roster next spring. There will also be Mike Wright, Tyler Wilson, and Zach Davies who all would have had a full year at AAA. So it's not like someone is being rushed to fill their spots.

The Orioles would probably be better off spending free agent money on a hitter, if they decide to spend money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am working on a bigger piece to post about the pitching, but I started thinking really hard about this question. I have coded pitchers in red who I think have a 50+% of getting a QO and purple for less than 50%.

There will be quite a few front line starters available. There will also be quite a few middle of the rotation pitchers who won't cost draft picks.

I could conceivably see Chen accepting a $16M QO and entering a weaker market after 2016. Though with Boras as his agent, I could see him turning down the QO to go after a bigger contract, something similar to Ubaldo's contract, perhaps as a secondary signing to whomever signs one of the frontline starters and only has to give up their second pick. I also see a scenario where his market is dimished after declining the QO.

I hope he does get the QO and accepts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not? A one year deal for a league average or slightly better left handed pitcher who is still relatively young?

Assuming he pitches to form I would have no problem at all with Chen back on a one year deal next year.

O's should have plenty of room for his salary.

I'm fine with a QO for Chen, it's low risk. With Boras you'd assume he'll go for the long-term deal at highest possible AAV. I do think Chen might be risk for another team without the O's defense, but not enough to keep his contract in the Oriole range.

I believe that league average lefties, (or slightly better) with a qualifying offer attached, will be able to obtain an AAV of 13 million per year for three years. Chen? I believe he is going for 65 million.

If you're right, then 100% you give him a QO and wish him well. Chen is basically a 2-win player, and that contract (I'm assuming you meant 4/65) is betting he'll be worth about 2 1/2 wins a year for each of the next four years. That's not a terrible risk, but he does have some injury history and I don't see the O's paying market rates for a slightly above average starter for four years. Not when they have proven they can get a similar pitcher at arb rates for middling prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if Chen has another year like 2014 that the Orioles will make a very serious run at signing him and QO him for sure if not able to sign ( I think most all the other free agents are gone- Wieters (although if he has a lousy year, Orioles might strike a showcase one year deal with him), Davis, Norris, Hunter, Matusz, Wright, we might re-sign O'Day but only if he has a good year). He is our only left handed starter we have and there isn't anybody in the pipeline that is left handed- Gausman, Bundy, Mike Wright, Tyler Wilson, Zach Davies, Hunter Harvey...all right handed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if Chen has another year like 2014 that the Orioles will make a very serious run at signing him and QO him for sure if not able to sign ( I think most all the other free agents are gone- Wieters (although if he has a lousy year, Orioles might strike a showcase one year deal with him), Davis, Norris, Hunter, Matusz, Wright, we might re-sign O'Day but only if he has a good year). He is our only left handed starter we have and there isn't anybody in the pipeline that is left handed- Gausman, Bundy, Mike Wright, Tyler Wilson, Zach Davies, Hunter Harvey...all right handed.

Matusz isn't a free agent. He will be in his last year of arbitration. Hopefully he will finally be nontendered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matusz isn't a free agent. He will be in his last year of arbitration. Hopefully he will finally be nontendered.

Or they might actually move toward putting him in the rotation next spring if he is the only left-hander left standing. Heaven forbid!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm fine with a QO for Chen, it's low risk. With Boras you'd assume he'll go for the long-term deal at highest possible AAV. I do think Chen might be risk for another team without the O's defense, but not enough to keep his contract in the Oriole range.

If you're right, then 100% you give him a QO and wish him well. Chen is basically a 2-win player, and that contract (I'm assuming you meant 4/65) is betting he'll be worth about 2 1/2 wins a year for each of the next four years. That's not a terrible risk, but he does have some injury history and I don't see the O's paying market rates for a slightly above average starter for four years. Not when they have proven they can get a similar pitcher at arb rates for middling prospects.

No. Not terrible risk. And yes. I did mean for four. If Boras insists on five, I suspect he won't get more than 72.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...