Jump to content

Get to know Yovani Gallardo


weams

Recommended Posts

Think Gallardo got really lucky there. A lot of hard hit balls and deep counts. I do appreciate Buck ganked him when he did. Didn't sound like Buck was ecstatic with Yovani's performance:

“Got the ball down a little bit,” Showalter said. “What I saw different was he got the first inning behind him. That may sound ... He hasn’t been out there in a while. I think he’s still a little frustrated with his command a little bit, got some balls where he didn’t want to get them and paid the price early.
“I wanted to get him one more up in the sixth inning. He hadn’t been there, so accomplished some things with him tonight. I think, hopefully, he’s going to get better as we go.”
“One of the biggest plays of the game was the double play ball that he got to kind of set up getting out of there,” Showalter said. “That had the look of an early departure.”

Regardless, was good to see Gallardo get himself back to together and put up some goose-eggs after. It really looked like it was going to be a disastrous outing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 480
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Gallardo has basically no cutter tonight at all and his fastball wasn't much and he still got us into the 6th tight so we ended up winning the game. I'm going to keep typing it. The guy just knows how to pitch. If his shoulder holds up at all, he will help us a lot. It won't be about stats. It will be about winnable games. With this offense, that is what we need.

Nice damn win tonight boys!

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Well said and I agree, he doesn't need to be pretty to be effective.

I'd take 3 runs and 5 or 6 innings every 5 days from him and be ecstatic.

So far so good, even with the diminished velocity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was 89-90 for the most part today with the fastball. 87-91 (touching 92 a couple times in his last start). Showing about a 2 MPH improvement over where he was in April, which is not insignificant. Average fastball last year was 89-93, so he's still down about 2 MPH but much better than being down 4 MPH.

I'll take what he has given us in the last two starts for the rest of the season and call it a victory considering how he looked in April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, he basically put the cutter in his pocket mid-way through the first inning. He also started throwing the curve more mid-way through the first. His curve was his best pitch tonight IMO. His fastball had no finish in the first, but it was ok after that. Not great finish, but enough to keep them off the offspeed stuff. More than anything, he was pitching to a lot of different quadrants so the hitters couldn't zone in on him.

He definitely didn't have the finish on the cutter and fastball tonight that he did the last start. We need to hope that isn't a recurring theme. It is about the time for a little dead arm for him based on the number of appearances since he came back. We will see.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to vatech1994 again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck just said that the Frederick defense behind Gallardo was "porous."

The Keys' defense made 4 errors in 2 innings today ...... 3 of them by Jomar Reyes.

The 3 errors that they committed in the 6th inning led to 6 unearned runs ...... and the final score of the games was: ) SALEM - 6 )) FREDERICK - 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to be a pretty consistent pattern that he's done by the sixth or so. But his stuff is much better than it was earlier in the year. He and the training staff deserve a lot of credit because in April he looked finished as a professional baseball player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

12 OUTS: 5 Strikeouts, 5 Groundouts, 2 Popouts

YOVANI GALLARDO O (vs. DODGERS, 7/04)

IP:l 4

H:;; 6 ll(2 Home Runs, 4 Singles)

R:l) 4

BB:)3

SO:)5

Pitches: 95 (54 Strikes, 41 Balls)

2016 ERA: 6.10

PITCHES BY INNING

****************

20 (11 Strikes, 91 Balls)

17 (12 Strikes, 51 Balls)

24 (11 Strikes, 13 Balls)

34 (20 Strikes, 14 Balls)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • We played all our Saturday games at home at 4pm. That should help us.  I don’t know if that was the full reason we made the switch this year, but it had to factor in. We didn’t do so well in the day games last year in the playoffs.  Also, don’t be surprised to see McCann get a big hit in game 1 and possibly just start this entire series versus the speedster Royals.  Let’s go. We owe these “guys” big time paybacks even if it’s 10 years later. 
    • They also smacked him around for 7 ER on 9 H in 1.2 innings. He can be beaten, though he certainly had a great September.  
    • I understand why posters would want to avoid Skubal in a game 1, but the Royals starters are not going to be a cakewalk. Probably a deeper starting staff with Ragans, Lugo and Wacha.
    • Interesting article …. Pretty surprising stat with all the guys that we lost to injury       https://www.masnsports.com/blog/orioles-made-it-through-rough-t
    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...