Jump to content

Gallardo - Roch: deal is DONE (signed)


weams

Recommended Posts

Which guys? Hard to say that about Fowler. Last three seasons: 2.0, 1.8, 2.2 rWAR and 2.2, 1.4 and 3.1 fWAR. At $7MM per win, that's easily $15MM per. Good chance he'll be worth more based on defense moving to COF (considering his offensive profile plays there still).

He meant Heyward and Price were overpaid, I believe.

I agree I'm very happy with Fowler's price, $11 mil for a 2-win player. I thought we were going to get negative value from RF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 873
  • Created
  • Last Reply
At the end of the day The Orioles docs, for better or worse, have been right more then they have been wrong in this regard.

The fact we haven't seen some massive proclamation and denial from Gallardo's camp (a'la Balfour) tells me that he doesn't necessarily doubt whatever it is came up.

Well said, should be interesting to hear what new info comes out from the additional testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the Sun:

The sense that I’ve gotten is that the Orioles are not only doing their due diligence by ordering a second round of tests, but are being super cautious because of the draft-pick compensation tied to Gallardo. If the Orioles did not have to give up a draft pick to sign him, it might not be a major issue.

This situation feels a little different. Gallardo has no history of trouble with his shoulder. The ACL surgery Gallardo had in 2008 – the injury cost him most of the season – is his only significant injury. He has never missed time with any arm issues.

But again, if the Orioles were hesitant to forfeit a draft pick initially, it’s understandable that they would get jittery about a perceived arm issue.

It is commonplace to find some wear and tear on any pitcher’s arm. In fact, it’s rare to see a completely clean MRI on a pitcher’s shoulder, because there is a natural breakdown there over time.

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2016/02/lets-get-physical-with-orioles.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the Sun:

The sense that I’ve gotten is that the Orioles are not only doing their due diligence by ordering a second round of tests, but are being super cautious because of the draft-pick compensation tied to Gallardo. If the Orioles did not have to give up a draft pick to sign him, it might not be a major issue.

This situation feels a little different. Gallardo has no history of trouble with his shoulder. The ACL surgery Gallardo had in 2008 – the injury cost him most of the season – is his only significant injury. He has never missed time with any arm issues.

But again, if the Orioles were hesitant to forfeit a draft pick initially, it’s understandable that they would get jittery about a perceived arm issue.

It is commonplace to find some wear and tear on any pitcher’s arm. In fact, it’s rare to see a completely clean MRI on a pitcher’s shoulder, because there is a natural breakdown there over time.

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2016/02/lets-get-physical-with-orioles.html

Thanks Grimes. I think if this is becoming an increasingly used method to negotiate by the club, they are entering dangerous waters. That will really start to deter other potential free agents. Having said that, doesn't seem to be deterring yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm holding out hope that the Gallardo situation gets resolved today, one way or the other. In my mind, I had already convinced myself that Gallardo was a done deal, so I'll be disappointed if the deal falls through. But if Sir Loin's contact saying there's nothing to worry about is any indication, not to mention Roch's gut feeling that the deal gets finalized while on the radio last night, I feel like it will happen. Sounds like this was more about the O's docs being extra cautious, especially with the loss of a draft pick involved, as opposed to a serious concern that could sabotage the deal. Sir Loin, if you have an update for us, please chime in.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying the Orioles are wrong. But this is why it's important to develop SP. Veteran pitchers are going to have wear and tear on their arms. It's very well likely the Orioles may have been interested in Kazmir/Fister/Latos over sacrificing a pick for Gallardo. Maybe they wanted nothing to do with the Orioles and their physical. If they Gallardo deal falls through, his chances of pitching before June is almost slim to none, atleast for a team who has to surrender a pick. And he won't be getting anywhere close to what the Orioles offered. Again, the Orioles are doing what they need to do. But I think it will make FA (especially pitchers) leary of negotiating with the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm holding out hope that the Gallardo situation gets resolved today, one way or the other. In my mind, I had already convinced myself that Gallardo was a done deal, so I'll be disappointed if the deal falls through. But if Sir Loin's contact saying there's nothing to worry about is any indication, not to mention Roch's gut feeling that the deal gets finalized while on the radio last night, I feel like it will happen. Sounds like this was more about the O's docs being extra cautious, especially with the loss of a draft pick involved, as opposed to a serious concern that could sabotage the deal. Sir Loin, if you have an update for us, please chime in.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Sir_Loin has been on point about almost everything Gallardo/Fowler-related, that I almost trust him as much as anyone in the media. I do think it will be resolved today- they have the additional test results and so all that is left is to make a decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sources: O's will not finish the Yovani Gallardo deal if they come to believe a breakdown is likely in the middle of the 3-year contract.</p>— Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) <a href="

">February 24, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sources: O's will not finish the Yovani Gallardo deal if they come to believe a breakdown is likely in the middle of the 3-year contract.</p>— Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) <a href="
">February 24, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Guys like Olney and Rosenthal get paid for these groundbreaking reports?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sources: O's will not finish the Yovani Gallardo deal if they come to believe a breakdown is likely in the middle of the 3-year contract.? Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) February 24, 2016

Yep. And the Orioles expect the ground to get wet if it rains. Dynamite scoop there by Buster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • We played all our Saturday games at home at 4pm. That should help us.  I don’t know if that was the full reason we made the switch this year, but it had to factor in. We didn’t do so well in the day games last year in the playoffs.  Also, don’t be surprised to see McCann get a big hit in game 1 and possibly just start this entire series versus the speedster Royals.  Let’s go. We owe these “guys” big time paybacks even if it’s 10 years later. 
    • They also smacked him around for 7 ER on 9 H in 1.2 innings. He can be beaten, though he certainly had a great September.  
    • I understand why posters would want to avoid Skubal in a game 1, but the Royals starters are not going to be a cakewalk. Probably a deeper starting staff with Ragans, Lugo and Wacha.
    • Interesting article …. Pretty surprising stat with all the guys that we lost to injury       https://www.masnsports.com/blog/orioles-made-it-through-rough-t
    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...