Jump to content

Gallardo - Roch: deal is DONE (signed)


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 873
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Very happy it's all over finally. Now, on to winning!

I'll be happy if Gallardo starts 30 games this year, pitches at least 190 innings, and is at least a league-average starter. For me, anything beyond that would be icing on the cake.

My biggest concern is that Gallardo will either get injured and/or continue to pitch while injured early on in the season, and subsequently leave a big hole in the Orioles' 2016 starting rotation. If that happens, then the reduction of his contract by one year will do little to soothe me. We're counting on him to be a durable, and (at least) a pretty good pitcher. I hope that the concern over the results of his physical wind up being much ado about nothing ...... because if it isn't/wasn't, then we could be in trouble, even with our extremely potent offense and the addition of Dexter Fowler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather amusingly, the Orioles now have Gallardo at the price that he's worth if he is completely healthy. The 4th year option in the initial contract didn't have much value - he wasn't likely to be worth it. Now, if he pitches 2 seasons healthy and doesn't fall apart, the third year option is likely to be exercised and becomes valuable. He probably won't be worth the ~6 WAR over the next 3 years to justify the $33MM+pick, and the upside isn't high, but the downside risk is mitigated by the fact that we can cut him after 2 years and only owe him $22MM.

I hope the medical concerns aren't too much of an issue. Definitely happy with this outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be happy if Gallardo starts 30 games this year, pitches at least 190 innings, and is at least a league-average starter. For me, anything beyond that would be icing on the cake.

My biggest concern is that Gallardo will either get injured and/or continue to pitch while injured early on in the season, and subsequently leave a big hole in the Orioles' 2016 starting rotation. If that happens, then the reduction of his contract by one year will do little to soothe me. We're counting on him to be a durable, and (at least) a pretty good pitcher. I hope that the concern over the results of his physical wind up being much ado about nothing ...... because if it isn't/wasn't, then we could be in trouble, even with our extremely potent offense and the addition of Dexter Fowler.

I agree totally with your assessment. For 22 guaranteed its hard not to like it.

Losing the pic seems to be the only downside of this deal. Time and money are excellent. He has the chance and talent to make this deal look like a bargain in 3 years.

...maybe I dream though.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...