Jump to content

Manfred: If MiLB Players Get Raise, Teams will Be Folded


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The NFL and NBA definitely don't pay college players, but they also don't control those players like they do minor leaguers. NFL has no minor league so its hard to compare that. NBA D League players earn $13,000-$25,000 during the season, $40 a day per diem on the road, housing and in season accomodations are provided. Im not saying they need to be paid more but they should at least provide somewhere to live in season.

Great points. Minor Leaguers should be allowed to play anywhere they like just like college players, if the comparison is apt. MLB is really doing everything it can to lose its anti-trust exemption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a team has, say, eight affiliates or equivalent that's in round numbers 200 MiLB players under contract. Let's pick a number and say they average $25k/player/year. That means the sum of all Orioles minor leaguers would make about what Pedro Alvarez does. If you doubled their salaries they'd make a bit more than Yovani Gallardo. Those are guesstimates, but probably in the ballpark.

The folding teams stuff sounds a lot like the hyperbolic exaggeration you hear from any business advocate about any tax or regulation or law that might possibly impact them in any way. Since all external influences are declared apocalyptic it's hard to separate truth from fiction.

I don't doubt that nearly free labor is one reason MLB teams feel free to control 90% of the best players in the world, and some players would shift to indy leagues and foreign leagues if salaries were forced up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Less than a $1000 a month during the year, nothing in the offseason. So, like $6000 a year. Minimum wage at 40 hours/week for half a year is something like $8000.

I (half) jokingly suspect there are quite a few Texas high school football stars who make more than that "working" at the car dealership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Less than a $1000 a month during the year, nothing in the offseason. So, like $6000 a year. Minimum wage at 40 hours/week for half a year is something like $8000.

Of course many of them get fairly significant signing bonuses that should last them for a while, and they do get daily meal money, correct?

Not saying they shouldn't get more money because they probably should, but there is a bit more there than meets the eye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they professionals? Drafted by an NFL or NBA team? They have no affiliation with the pro league.

That's what you have to do to get into their unions. It's not like you get scouted in the pickup games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course many of them get fairly significant signing bonuses that should last them for a while, and they do get daily meal money, correct?

Not saying they shouldn't get more money because they probably should, but there is a bit more there than meets the eye.

25 dollars meal money per day when away from home. Peanut butter and Jelly sandwiches in the clubhouse at home on a road trip. Unless a major leaguer is on rehab. Or Doc Shorebird is around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a team has, say, eight affiliates or equivalent that's in round numbers 200 MiLB players under contract. Let's pick a number and say they average $25k/player/year. That means the sum of all Orioles minor leaguers would make about what Pedro Alvarez does. If you doubled their salaries they'd make a bit more than Yovani Gallardo. Those are guesstimates, but probably in the ballpark.

The folding teams stuff sounds a lot like the hyperbolic exaggeration you hear from any business advocate about any tax or regulation or law that might possibly impact them in any way. Since all external influences are declared apocalyptic it's hard to separate truth from fiction.

I don't doubt that nearly free labor is one reason MLB teams feel free to control 90% of the best players in the world, and some players would shift to indy leagues and foreign leagues if salaries were forced up.

They do have an anti trust exemption. Which they defend rigorously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course many of them get fairly significant signing bonuses that should last them for a while, and they do get daily meal money, correct?

Not saying they shouldn't get more money because they probably should, but there is a bit more there than meets the eye.

If you define "many" as the top 3, 4, maybe 5 rounds of a 30+ round draft and none of the undrafted free agents. And "significant" as one-in-30 or 40 get several millions, and 80% or more get less than what many posters here earn in a month or two. What kind of bonus does a 15th round pick get? $4k and a bus ticket to spring training?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 dollars meal money per day when away from home. Peanut butter and Jelly sandwiches in the clubhouse at home on a road trip. Unless a major leaguer is on rehab. Or Doc Shorebird is around.

And don't they owe the clubhouse guy half or 2/3rds of their per diem for the clubhouse spread?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...